Reply With Quote
i don't need to remember anything tbh. prove it to me pav! this is what you do daily and i'm not going to stop this now so where's your proof?
To prove my opinion?
lol
It just happened today. Someone said you're a Republican.
Do you remember that?
i don't need to remember anything tbh. prove it to me pav! this is what you do daily and i'm not going to stop this now so where's your proof?
It just happened today.
The proof is in today's posts.
That posts you already read and responded to.
which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?
You already read and replied to them today.
Mere hours ago.
Do you seriously not remember what you did today?
Yes or no.
i remember plenty but refresh my memory pav. which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?
do you not want to prove your stance pav?
Yes or no.
You didn't answer yes or no.
Do you remember what you did today?
Yes or no.
i remember plenty pav. with that said, which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?
You didn't answer yes or no.
Do you remember what you did today?
Yes or no.
Don't dodge the question.
sure, yes i remember but refresh my memory pav. which posts would those be? how about citing them instead of dodging the question pav?
OK, no need for me to tell you what you did then.
Glad we got that settled.
“The FBI is intimately familiar with ‘material omissions’ with respect to their presentations to both Congress and the courts, and they are welcome to make public, to the greatest extent possible, all the information they have on these abuses,” said Nunes, a member of Trump’s transition team. “Regardless, it’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court do ent to fuel a counter-intelligence investigation during an American political campaign. Once the truth gets out, we can begin taking steps to ensure our intelligence agencies and courts are never misused like this again.”
lol Nunes
Another conspiracy!
How many is this total, TSA?
The Memo Freakout
January 31, 2018 6:04 PM
Donald Trump’s critics have moved beyond latter-day Cold Warrior mode into full blown McCarthyism. John Heilemann of MSNBC has taken to insinuating that Republican Devin Nunes, chairman of the House intelligence committee, might be a Russian plant. The congressman’s offense is producing and working to release a memo about the sources of the FBI’s surveillance of persons associated with the Trump campaign in 2016, which has made Nunes the most hated man in Washington for Democrats and the press.
The memo is portrayed as a blatant PR gimmick and a clear and present danger to America’s intelligence operations. But from what we know of Nunes and his colleagues, they have long been sincerely alarmed at what they’ve learned about how the FBI operated in 2016. The su ions have been heightened by the bizarre stonewalling of the committee’s inquiry by a Republican-led Justice department (this background accounts for why the committee hasn’t worked closely with the DOJ on the memo).
As for endangering U.S. intelligence, the committee has scrupulously followed the process to declassify the do ent in such cir stances. Nunes or someone else could have simply leaked the do ent to a sympathetic reporter — this is how Washington usually works — but he has instead played by the rules. The White House is, per chief of staff John Kelly, currently scrubbing the do ent, and presumably anything that reveals sources and methods will be redacted.
We can’t know if the do ent is nearly as explosive as advertised until we see it. Perhaps the presuppositions of the committee Republicans have led them to an overly hostile interpretation of the material. (The FBI is already out with a statement saying that the memo leaves out important details.) But you don’t have to be Sean Hannity to be curious about the beginning of the investigation and its conduct, given the disturbing revelations of the last few months.
At the outset of all this, we favored a full investigation of the 2016 election controversies — from the Russian hacking to unmasking — to give the public as many facts as possible. Instead, the main investigation is taking place within the black box of a special-counsel probe. If nothing else, the Nunes memo will pull back the curtain on part of the story. The FBI and the Democrats can — and should — share their own versions. This is called public debate, and we assure the Red Hunters on the Left that this is not how the Kremlin conducts its affairs.
http://amp.nationalreview.com/articl...mpression=true
That's Trump's fault.At the outset of all this, we favored a full investigation of the 2016 election controversies — from the Russian hacking to unmasking — to give the public as many facts as possible. Instead, the main investigation is taking place within the black box of a special-counsel probe.
Too bad for him.
And what is Nunes doing to investigate the Russian hacking, TSA?
And why would Trump promise to release the memo without even reading it?
He still hasn't answer that? TSA stop being a got and answer the man.
It's his own cover up.
Looks like two can play that game.
Every mornin' at the mine you could see him arrive
He stood six-foot-six and weighed two-forty-five
Kinda broad at the shoulder and narrow at the hip
And everybody knew ya didn't give no lip to big Ron
I'm pretty sure the WH, including Trash, has read the memo, in collusion with Nunes.
Repugs proving they care about and know how to govern.
Lol @ blue team ting their pants over the memos release.
lol @ CC buying into muh memo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions