Reply With Quote
And then Assange busted trying to send Hannity dirt on Warner. lol
HANNITY SAID TICK TOCKThe thing I love most is how TSA's self promises of "BOOMs" and " just got real" always implode on his head a few days later.
You dont even have to wait long.
And then Assange busted trying to send Hannity dirt on Warner. lol
"according to a person familiar with the matter." - sounds legitbut....Wray is Trump's guy.
Assange must have a business card with the le "Super Genius."
Are there YouTube comments on it?"according to a person familiar with the matter." - sounds legit
About Wray being Trump's guy and what that actually means in the investigation of the Trump campaign?
Post them.
All those degrees and can't get "they're" right.
Grammar police choo choo comin through
"It would appear"
i mean he's just retweeting Wapo/NYT/ABC stuff. the person retweeting the story doesn't really have much to do with the validity of the story. its not like kyle griffin is breaking any of these stories
It saves Darrin from discussing anything here.
Kyle Griffin retweeting WaPo is a little different than moonbat Mensch claiming Trump is getting the death penalty
kyle drugde... louise for brains mensch... both a scourge on this rock.Kyle Griffin retweeting WaPo is a little different than moonbat Mensch claiming Trump is getting the death penalty
How would you know?
You cant tell what Kyle is because 99.9% of his tweeter posts are retweets and non personal stuff.
For example, what we know of you from your posting history is that you're a hardcore republican (Almost alt-right level) that is in full denial, at least publicly.
Why is Nunes accusing Trump's appointees of a cover up, Chris?
Chris, "Judge not, and ye shall not be judged"
You're such a fake Christian.
Nancy Pavlosi confused today
You didn't answer the question, Chris.Nancy Pavlosi confused today
DOJ and FBI are run by Trump appointees.
Why is Nunes accusing Trump's appointees of a cover up, Chris?
Seven months later, Rosenstein made his pitch in the December meeting with the President, asking for White House backing as the Justice Department sought to deny access to sensitive do ents demanded by Nunes, who has spent months pursuing claims of surveillance abuses by the FBI and the Justice Department against the Trump campaign.
There was no decision by the President at the meeting, the sources told CNN.
White House chief of staff John Kelly later notified the Justice Department that the President would not help block access to the do ents.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/p...mpression=true
DNANancy Pavlosi confused today
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions