That's racist.
@PreetBhararaI mean come on when your memo is crapped on by Alberto "torture memo" Gonzales,
you're up hole creek I think @DevinNunes
That's racist.
People here have resorted to regurgitating tweets from people who would never be caught dead here.
#YoMemoJokes identifies 1000s of talented, creative,intelligent, informed comedy writers
actual "comedy gold"
Even the hashtag is so clever
Nunes And Trump Humiliated Again As #YoMemoJokes Rocks Twitter
http://www.nationalmemo.com/nunes-trump-humiliated-again-yomemojokes-rocks-twitter/
so let me break this down...
1) calf_tats and Mikeanaro originally claimed to have read a 6 page memo while also claiming there’s a separate 99 page memo.
2) Pavlov then laughs at them for claiming there’s a 99 page memo and then says their “6 page memo” is only 3.25 pages long.
3) They quickly proceed to give up on the idea of a 99 page memo but insist the actual memo is 6 pages long.
4) Pavlov says that if you had actually read it, you would know the White House added two pages that aren’t part of the actual memo congress released.
5) Their argument is then reduced to “haha stupid libs don’t know how to count...6 - 2 is 4 pages not 3.25 pages”, ignoring the possibility that the final page isn’t a full page (something someone who read the memo would know).
6) Splits posts a picture of the 4th page showing it’s not even half filled with text.
7) Mikeanaro then pretends he never said it was 99, 6 or 4 pages long but then decides to play semantics over 1/4th of a page vs. 1/3rd of a page, stating the memo is 3.33 pages long and that Splits can’t count if he thinks it’s 3.25 pages (even though 3.25 is much closer to 3.33 than the 99 pages, 6 pages or 4 full pages calf_tats was arguing for).
Did I get that all right?
Just like Chump to straw man the page count to duck and dodge the content.
What content?
That the Steele hit piece was the reason that they got the FISA warrant to spy on an American citizen and didnt disclose the source and admitted they couldnt have gotten the warrant without it. Pretty simple really.
If you read the memo, it acknowledges George Papajohn's drunken rant is what started everything. But you didn't read it.
someone else who cried like a all day yesterday when he realized Obama wasn’t getting put in handcuffs.
Lol first post I've made on the subject got.
Nice duck of the content though.
Did you read the memo?
Yes. Can you read?
I read it. And you clearly ignored the memo admitted there was already an investigation that s not started by the dossier.
So? That doesn't excuse lying to get a wiretap. That is, if you believe in the cons ution.
He said it was a 99 page memo to see if Chump was aware of the real number, Chumpster thinks its only 3.25 pages long which is highly inaccurate.
Also Chumps thinks there is no DNC involvement in the memo, no Hillary, no nothing.
So I dont know what you get right or wrong.
What content?
What if someone gave the DEA a made up report that you are a major drug dealer and they use that to show a judge to get a warrant and swat kicks your door in at midnight. Would that be OK with you? Its the same principle.
Who lied? 4 different judges found probable cause.
Except it’s not remotely the same. Holy , you Trump s are shook at how poorly the memo played to the general public.
The Dems knew what was in the #YoMemo, knew it was not legal, nothing but Nunes propaganda, and
Dems screamed wolf, national disaster loud and long about #YoMemo so the no-wolf letdown would be more severe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)