Reply With Quote
Yes FGA because his % is only 46%
Aldridge leads the league in post up FGAs.Still can't believe the Spurs signed two soft jump shooters bigs like Aldridge and Gasol and gifted Mills an elite level guard contract
Yes FGA because his % is only 46%
Well if Spurs are interested in Rodney Hood, perfect time to inquire about him while Jazz are in town.
Would they trade Hood? Thought they liked him.
Spurs need to dump Mills while teams still don't realize how bad he is.
They realize..
0.96 PPP is pretty damn elite at post up scoring.
They realized before 12:01.
Just speculation by the author:
"At just 21 years of age and with two more years left on his rookie contract, the last of which is still a team option, there’s a lot to like about Beasley. A young team with a solid core such as the Utah Jazz could add him as another piece of their future, or even a playoff team like the San Antonio Spurs could see him as a cost effective way to shore up wing depth right now, with the benefits of him developing into something more down the road."
https://www.denverstiffs.com/2018/2/2/16965504/rumor-denver-nuggets-making-malik-beasley-available-in-a-trade-interested-in-rodney-hood
I know very little of Malik Beasley .
Stating to get a feeling like the Spurs might actually make a move. We kinda have to imo.
On another note, Lebron and the Spurs need each other rn tbh.
Would be funny if the Spurs trade Aldridge and suddenly Kawhi is healthy.
wow these are not the Spurs from the Duncan era for sure... wow...
Yeah, for the first time that I have been a fan I am kinda of expecting a move to be made.
If only every team posted up as many times as the Spurs do -- then that would be an advantage. Unfortunately that's not the case as teams can manufacture better shots instead.
Teams have playmakers and generally don't miss two of their three best scorers.
I don't have any issues with his post ups, though it goes to show how much the NBA has changed though.
Having an inside out oriented offensive, it doesn't help that the Spurs are taking only 24.5 3's a game (ranked 24th) and hitting only 36% on them (17th)
Yep, totally agree with you. With the current personnel they have no other way to run an offense and Aldridge has been a good offensive focal point, however, when the shooters aren't hitting and when you have 2 players in the starting line-up who refuse to shoot, as well as no one to create or penetrate, this is what you get.
Kawhi can't return soon enough.
Mills is the new Bonner. Has no business being on this roster anymore. Brings nothing but the occasional 3 against scrub teams.
But his locker room culture.
They will need to make a move if only to shake up the overall morosity pervading the team..We all knew we were being kidded when they told us that some marginal role player is getting paid 50 millions to uphold det joyful "team culture"..
Nets wanted Mills last off season, Hornets want to cut salary, Spurs desperately need a starting PG / third star to not only contend, but possibly to get Leonard to extend too . . .
To Nets: Mills
To Hornets: Lin, Gay, Murray, Bertans, 1st
To Spurs: Walker, Williams
Would leave Spurs with enough breathing room under the tax to sign a big for the prorated minimum and duck the tax.
Never heard the Nets having interest, or at least I don't remember it.
Doesn't really make sense, they still had Lin and traded for DeAngelo Russell before the draft.
Can't find it, but am pretty sure Lowe tweeted it after Spurs re-signed Mills. He also called it a good deal for Spurs.
Guessing they saw him as someone who could set the tone for the type of culture they want to have, an ideal mentor for Russell and someone who can play some alongside of him, too. Lin likely would have become trade fodder.
Pop's move:
cut Brandon Paul and sign Hilliard for the rest of the season...
actually I have no idea about these two... but that is pretty much what I expect... either something minor like that or nothing.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
