Wrong, just like your claim Nunes was recused.
Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?
Wrong, just like your claim Nunes was recused.
So why didn't he even look at the source do ents?
Did the court require that information? Yes or No?
Nope. Why wouldn't Nunes look at relevant do ents? Unless he has no access to it. Which he does not have access to classified intelligence anymore.
BAIER: Did you read the actual FISA applications?
NUNES: No, I didn’t. This has been one of the bogus news stories that had been put out. So, the agreement we made with the Department of Justice was to create a reading room and allow one member and two investigators to go over and review the do ents. I thought the best person on our committee will be the chairman of the Oversight Committee, Trey Gowdy, who has a long career as a federal prosecutor, to go and do this.
GOWDY: This is the right time, for me, to leave politics
lol
So if I'm scanning this correctly, the position of the Posobiec/Cernovich/4chan wing hinges on the assumptions that:
- Intelligence sources cannot be impartial if they are funded by partisan groups
- FBI employees cannot have opinions about political candidates and contribute impartially to investiagations
Does that about cover it? These are certainly brand new standards regardless of how you feel about their validity.
Yeah and Great Satan du jour Bruce Ohr covered up Steele's desperation to prevent a Trump presidency by officially do enting an interview saying Steele was desperate to prevent a Trump presidency.
Diabolical!
Guy never takes a day off, cuckposting and atheistposting 24/7 365
I mean, Gowdy, the one guy who actually read the application, is the same guy that's saying Mueller's investigation is in no way discredited or compromised, and voiced legitimate concerns. And this is a guy who typically isn't afraid to take partisan stances on investigations (made his congressional career on benghazi)
that loses its effect when you essentially use that to describe anything you don't agree with
Yeah yeah we get it, it triggers you you’ve told me before
still virgin bro ?
Still 2nd grade brah? Grow up and get better insults tbh. At least be funny
Yeah. start using cuck more. GOAT insult
Tings must be slow today in the caliphate of frankistan tbh
You dodged a very simple yes or no question. Try again.
Was the court notified the dossier was funded by the DNC/Clinton campaign yes or no?
DOJ only allowed one member of congress to review and Nunes chose Gowdy as he would be the most qualified to review them. You keep saying Nunes doesn't have access to classified intelligence anymore and that is a lie just like when you said Nunes recused himself from the investigation.
Nunes: Fine, the FBI Didn’t Lie, But Its Font Was Too Small
Nunes was asked about this on Fox & Friends.
He did not deny the point.
Instead he insisted that it wasn’t good enough because the disclosure was merely a footnote.
“A footnote saying something may be political
is a far cry from letting the American people know that
the Democrats and the Hillary campaign paid for dirt that
the FBI then used to get a warrant on an American citizen to spy on another campaign,”
the distinguished Republicanexplained.
Notice how “The FBI LIED about the Steele dossier” has been scaled back to,
“The FBI did not highlight the truth about the Steele Dossier in the part of the application we bothered to read.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/02/nunes-fine-the-fbi-didnt-lie-but-its-font-was-too-small.html
Like TSA, Nunes is just so FULL OF
Why did non-recused Nunes choose himself instead of Gowdy?
Nunes was admitting he's an self-indicting unqualified dumb ?![]()
But farmer Nunes thinks he knows enough Federal law to bring down Mueller?
...
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-06-2018 at 03:30 PM.
Does the court require that? If they do not, then no issue.
Who would understand the source do ents better Nunes or a former Federal prosecutor?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)