Reply With Quote
If it’s so easy to understand why can’t you understand it?
stuff that points to the facts
I’ll ask you again Reck, when did the FBI investigation into Russian interference begin?
LOL you re .
It's so easy to understand if you actually read stuff that points to facts instead of dumbass conspiracies.
But the Obama briefing referenced was about Russian meddling in the 2016 election, not the Clinton investigation, a source familiar with the texts told HuffPost.https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b044b38218cd7bThe texts were exchanged ahead of Obama’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 5. Obama later publicly stated that he confronted Putin about Russian election interference during that meeting, telling him to “cut it out.”
Unlike your boy toy, Obama actually had the guts to call out Putin and Russian out publicly.
If it’s so easy to understand why can’t you understand it?
I’ll ask you again Reck, when did the FBI investigation into Russian interference begin?
I dont see what that has anything to do with Obama was in on the Hillary email serve investigation narrative.If it’s so easy to understand why can’t you understand it?
I’ll ask you again Reck, when did the FBI investigation into Russian interference begin?
The texts once again are out of context, the record gets set straight and Johnson goes back to his hole.
But since you're you, you're still lapping up every conspiracy you get your hands on.
regarding my post with the link explaning things...why dont you read it? Afraid?
Your link quotes people familiar with the texts, whatever the that is supposed to mean. Your link is a pathetic attempt to create an alternate story for the texts.
Stop dodging the question. When did the FBI investigation into Russian interference begin?
I posted a second link with quotes and all.
It doesn't get any clearer than:
The texts were exchanged ahead of Obama’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Sept. 5. Obama later publicly stated that he confronted Putin about Russian election interference during that meeting, telling him to “cut it out.”
The doesn’t clear anything up.I posted a second link with quotes and all.
It doesn't get any clearer than:
When did the FBI investigation into Russian interference begin?
Maybe Pavlov can answer since you’re having trouble.
This guy and Peter Strzok interviewed Clinton, Mills, and Abedin.
A new TSA conspiracy is born.
You're too far behind in answering questions to ever catch up tbh.
But the answer to your question is April 2016.
April 2016 start date for official FBI investigation into Russian interference in our election? Your timeline is off.
No new conspiracy just another name to add to a long list of demoted/fired/retiring top FBI/DOJ agents involved in Clinton email/Russia investigation.A new TSA conspiracy is born.
Strzok
McCabe
Yates
Ohr
Baker
Carlin
Laufman
Am I missing anyone?
Nope. I'm right.
TSA, etc being demagogued as a good sheeple by Fox/Repug strategy of trashing of Mueller/FBI in preparation for Mueller (FBI) indicting, subpoenaing Trash and mafiya, at which point Fox/Repugs/TSA/etc will scream "facts, evidence don't matter", Mueller/FBI are corrupt, politicized.
Link?
I think you’re confusing Russian collusion investigation and Russian election interference investigation.
I’ve never trashed Mueller nor called for him to be removed.
And it’s clear the FBI/DOJ was corrupt and politicized. The OIG investigation your side called for will ironically expose it all.
1) What's the difference?
2) What are your dates for both, with links?
Will post links (again) after you answer.
FBI TRASHED Hillary TWICE into defeat
FBI ELECTED Trash,
while hiding FBI investigation of Trash and his mafiya connections to Russia.
but they are politicized against Trash.
We all know damn well that Trash/Repugs/Fox/Breitbart don't separate FBI from FBI Mueller, so that their trashing FBI includes Mueller, even if you're so politicized to lie about it.
You are calling for Rosenstein to be fired, which will most likely end up severely limit the Mueller investigation.
It won't go the way you want it to.And it’s clear the FBI/DOJ was corrupt and politicized. The OIG investigation your side called for will ironically expose it all.
collusion april 2016
interference dec 2016
No links and you didn't say what the difference is.
Collusion is interference. How could it not be? Unless you're claiming they were suspected of colluding over something other than the election.
yeah. i mean the allegation is russia pulled various stunts to interfere with the election (hacking DNC emails, disinformation campaign, etc), and the trump campaign was allegedly complicit in those efforts
there is no collusion allegation/investigation if not for the election interference
and that is also expressly forbidden by le I
(B)there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802
I never called for Rosenstein to be fired stop lying. You and I were discussing a hypothetical and you yourself said if Rosenstein broke protocol he should be fired. Would I be correct in running around saying you also are calling for Rosenstein to be fired?
It's already going to the way I want it to. Obama and Yates tried to neuter Horowitz by taking away his oversight of the NSD, but he's had power restored and has been working quietly behind the scenes for over a year. Horowitz is working directly with the House and Senate and fulfilling every request the FBI and DOJ have refused to complete. Where do you think the source do ents Nunes used to compile the memo came from? Who recovered the texts from Strzok/Page the FBI said went missing? Who has been providing Grassley with all the do ents requested?It won't go the way you want it to.
Broke protocol? I don't think that's the condition you laid out, so don't use that goalpost.
It's not going to go the way you want it to.It's already going to the way I want it to. Obama and Yates tried to neuter Horowitz by taking away his oversight of the NSD, but he's had power restored and has been working quietly behind the scenes for over a year. Horowitz is working directly with the House and Senate and fulfilling every request the FBI and DOJ have refused to complete. Where do you think the source do ents Nunes used to compile the memo came from? Who recovered the texts from Strzok/Page the FBI said went missing? Who has been providing Grassley with all the do ents requested?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions