Green is going to be 31 in a few months and is most likely going to become a free agent this summer. Getting rid of him before having to sign him up to another 4+ year deal is probably not a bad move. I love Danny but not sure they should re-sign him to a bunch of $ this off-season. I know Bradley will be a FA also but at least the Spurs can get an up close look at him beforehand and hes only 27 years old.
that, if that's the trade - Danny and a first round pick, that'd be ing insane. The front office should all be fired if they go through with that.in' PATFO..
Always treated Green like a whipping boy..From Pop trotting him out for weeks on court while he was still evidently hampered by his groin to him getting openly dangled to the Cavs last summer there (albeit for a Star), his value for them, apparently, isn't as high as many thought here..
This front office have lost the plot entirely (if this purported deal (Green + 1st) goes down-- even a Green for Bradley straight swap is an awful move)..
Green finally shows up when he hears he could get traded...
If Danny wasn’t an average shooter these days this wouldn’t be on the table...
Trading Danny,a reliable Playoff Performer, for AB? no. Give them Mills and the first or tell them to go themselves.
Also, if they trade away Danny it's one less reason for Lebron to come to SA.
You think I hate rc and pop now? Wait till they trade Danny green for a rapist
I kind of overreacted at first.. but have you guys not stopped to think that it was the CLIPPERS who are asking about this deal? When you think about it, it leans towards that as being the case.
Trading Green is essentially a pathetic attempt to palliate the abomination of last offseason that is the 100 millions tagged on Pau/Mills.
I knew between Green and Parker someone gotta give in their next free agency. It looks like they have decided it will be DG..
"The culture" can't make a pass to save his life.
If you think Kawhi is leaving then giving up a first round pick makes very little sense. The only logical thing I can come to with regards to SA being willing to move Danny (a better player) and a pick for Bradley is:
They know there is some discord with Danny and he’s opting out. At the same time, they know that Manu & TP are gone. They can’t afford to take a step back with Kawhi, so since they aren’t comfortable with Murray/Forbes/White/Mills as the guard rotation and no money to improve that, you move for Bradley AND he’s willing to sign the extension (so it’s not a first for a rental).
Bradley is not Danny, but for MLE level money which is all the Spurs would have in this scenario to replace Danny who they know is opting out and leaving SA you can’t do much better than Bradley even if he’s clearly worse than Danny.
So instead of having only Murray/Forbes/Mills/White you add Bradley to the mix to replace Danny who’s gone in the off season, TP and Manu too.
But logically beyond my reasoning, it stands that SA would probably not trade Danny for Bradley let alone add a first in. But we will see.
If it’s Mills it makes perfect sense for reasons I pointed out week or two ago.
LMAOOOOOO
I actually don't think so. Adding Danny puts us into the tax, and the Clippers have been trying to avoid the tax all season. We would have to dump salary elsewhere to offset it.
I'd still do the trade in a heartbeat, though.
I’m sure Danny for Avery has been discussed. It probably lasted 1 minute with R.C saying no. I hope. I’m sure the Clippers requested Danny. PATFO should have responded to that request by rejecting it, but who knows. They ya e Gasol 16 million for two years and Mills 50 million.
Another midget for Pop's midget rotation? This has to be a deal proposed by the Clip-jobs.
LAC is not going to pay tax with this team. They just aren’t and would be dumb to do so. The deal would involved a third team or it would be Bradley + someone for Danny or Mills + someone so that salaries match (would just be done in two transactions_
It doesn't make sense that PATFO would turn down a Danny-for-Avery trade to the Pistons only to make the deal with the Clip-jobs.
I can't see the Patfo giving up Green for Bradley .
I don’t see the Spurs trading away Danny Green. For one his contract is expiring. If they aren’t going to trade Kawhi then it means that there is hope he is coming back soon and trading Danny means missing with the chemistry that got them to the WCF. I don’t see them being that dumb. Bradley would be a good addition, but giving up Danny Green would not help them this season.
Are re ed homers here choosing Green or Fatty s over Bradley????
Holee
Goddamnhomerism is a cancer
Good for sa ^
FBI/Comey, aka Trash's Nazis, handed WH to Trash, but protected Hillary!
That's good comedy right there. I don't think those words have ever been uttered before ... or ever will be again.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
