Reply With Quote
Dodge #3.
You still have questions to answer after lying about your own post.
1) What's the difference?
2) What are your dates for both, with links?
Quit dodging.
that would be awesome.
Dodge #3.
You still have questions to answer after lying about your own post.
1) What's the difference?
2) What are your dates for both, with links?
Quit dodging.
Obama ordered an investigation in December 2016. FBI started theirs in April 2106. I provided the December 2016 link, you provided the April 2016 link. Enough with the redundant questions.I'm mocking him and you.
Dodge #2.
"Obama ordered an investigation."
Now you're lying about what you said.
1) What's the difference?
2) What are your dates for both, with links?
Quit dodging.
You are boring me. Moving on.
Add another to the list!BREAKING: Another Longtime Aide To James Comey OUT at FBI
Michael Kortan, the FBI’s Head of Public Affairs and longtime aide to former bureau chief James Comey, is leaving his post.
Strzok
McCabe
Yates
Ohr
Baker
Carlin
Laufman
Kortan
Am I missing anyone?
But Flynn lied to the FBI!
Comey
This is a flat out lie. You even lie about what you post yourself.
A report is not an investigation.
Dodge #4.FBI started theirs in April 2106. I provided the December 2016 link, you provided the April 2016 link. Enough with the redundant questions.
You are boring me. Moving on.
You said I was getting confused. I asked you to clear it up. You dodged.
1) What's the difference?
2) What are your dates for both, with links?[/quote]
Quit dodging.
pretty sure obama's december 2016 thing was specific to cyber activity/hacking... for security purposes. thats different than a broader investigation into russian meddling/influence
Even TSA said he ordered a report before he lied and said Obama ordered an investigation.
lol
Again, according to the FISA laws, they didn't have to have the court order to begin surveillance as soon as Page turned up on Trump's doorstep. Obtaining the order is only necessary if they wanted to use something they found in Court. It's inadmissible otherwise.
Again, you're pushing a fantasy where Lynch just wiretapped Trump without any authorization.
..and you're defending Lynch/Hillary because...reasons.
Didn't have to be Lynch...
(g)“Attorney General” means the Attorney General of the United States (or Acting Attorney General), the Deputy Attorney General, or, upon the designation of the Attorney General, the Assistant Attorney General designated as the Assistant Attorney General for National Security under section 507A of le 28.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1801
No need to defend anyone when there is no evidence against them.
OK, who was it in this case?
Name a name.
lol they cant just begin surveillance just for funsies
and if they began surveillance without an order, they would have to inform them within 10 days of (B)the facts and cir stances relied upon by the applicant to justify the applicant’s belief that each new facility or place at which the electronic surveillance is directed is or was being used, or is about to be used, by the target of the surveillance
and this would only apply in cir stances where they aren't sure of the location.
again, alleging that they violated FISA laws and did unauthorized surveillance isn't very different than saying FISA statues allowed them to conduct the alleged behavior
Again, I'm not pushing any theories. I'm just interpreting the law, and showing that there are ways around them. To summarize:
Can an emergency order be issued by the AG office to surveil someone before an Court Order is obtained? Yes.
Can the FISA Order include electronically surveilling known Trump locations? Yes.
Can new locations for surveillance be added to the order between 10-60 days after surveillance has started? Yes
But there is zero evidence any of this ever happened.
Agreed. Your initial question that I answered was:
"Could Trump be wiretapped because of a FISA I order on Page"
Yes, any potential locations where Page would have operated were in play.
You didn't ask "Was Trump wiretapped because of a FISA I order on Page."
Yes that is the point. The Page/Strzok texts in September about "POTUS wants to know everything we are working on" could not be about the Obama announcement in December to look into Russian cyber activity/hacking. The Clinton email investigation had already supposedly been shut down by September. The only investigation Obama could have been asking to know everything about from the FBI was Trump/Russia collusion.
"I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line and always have maintained it. I guarantee it,”
"I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI, not just in this case but in any case."---Obama April 2016
reduced to semantics...sad
Honestly dude is there any credible source out there that agrees with you that all these en ies are ed the way you say they are?
You're reduced to flat out lying...sad.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
