Reply With Quote
What are you saying she did, TSA?
Give a list of her transgressions.
Pavlov you seemed to think the Schiff memo was pretty important, after reading the dismantling of it here do you still feel the same?Here is some Friday afternoon reading entertainment. For all of those that thought the Nunes memo was a nothingburger you're going to have to come up with a new term for Schiff's memoHe get's absolutely destroyed in this meeting.
http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG...t-20180205.pdf
What are you saying she did, TSA?
Give a list of her transgressions.
I haven't read the Schiff memo.
Have you?
Give me a link to it.
Purportedly it defends the character of Steele and other swamp creatures. You're probably better off reading the funny papers.
Have you read it?
Got a link to it?
I haven’t read it either. I have read a detailed breakdown of everything it isn’t in the house meeting provided in the link.
Have you read the link yet? You only need to read the first few pages to see the Schiff memo dismantled.
So, the memo isn't even out yet and you haven't read it?
Is that what you're saying?
It definitely doesn’t refute the Nunes memo as claimed.
there's not much to refute tbh
I clearly said I hadn’t read it, but keep the tired schtick going.
The Schiff memo is discussed by house members who have read the memo and they dismantle it in the link. Have you read the transcript from the house meeting yet?
That makes the Schiff memo even more embarrassing since it refuted nothing.there's not much to refute tbh
They must be really afraid of it if they are trying to pre-refute it.
Let me know when you read the memo, OK?
More than a few pages actually. Turner starts in on Schiff Page 8
This guy read it @ 2:59
dismantling.
did YOU read it?
They are laughing at his memo.
Why do you refuse to read the meeting transcript? Afraid to see Schiff flounder about after being made a fool?
I didn't ask if some guy read it.
I asked if you read it and for a link to the memo.
Your whining about someone not reading something is rich.
They are laughing at his memo.
Why do you refuse to read the meeting transcript? Afraid to see Schiff flounder about after being made a fool?
You're still have about twenty questions to answer, coward.
Yes.
did YOU read it?
Why do you refuse to read the meeting transcript? Aren’t you curious what Schiff’s memo contains?
Representative John Ratcliffe of the House Judiciary Committee is good enough for me. Trump has to approve it before I can opine. Why are you asking for impossibles again?
- Turner acknowledges that they aren't even allowed to discuss what's in the memo. So there's nothing to dismantle
- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict the claim that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Why would it contradict that? That has never been disputed.
- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict that the court was not made aware that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Again, we already knew that. From what has been said, the Court was made aware in a footnote that the dossier was of a political origin or political opposition research, even if they didn't specify by name the source. And again, I think it's been learned that it is common practice to do such.
- Turner says the memo DOESN'T "say that it is okay for politically paid material to be used as evidence in a FISA court." That would be something that has to come in legislation. Not an opinion in a ing memo
that's the dismantling?
so Turner dismantled the schiff memo by saying the schiff memo doesn't dispute things that it never intended to dispute. fascinating stuff, TSA
I am curious to read Schiff's memo.
Have you read it?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions