Grassley's Oversight Investigation into the political corruption of the FBI and DOJ

**spurraider21** · 02-09-2018

- Turner acknowledges that they aren't even allowed to discuss what's in the memo. So there's nothing to dismantle

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict the claim that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Why would it contradict that? That has never been disputed.

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict that the court was not made aware that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Again, we already knew that. From what has been said, the Court was made aware in a footnote that the dossier was of a political origin or political opposition research, even if they didn't specify by name the source. And again, I think it's been learned that it is common practice to do such.

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T "say that it is okay for politically paid material to be used as evidence in a FISA court." That would be something that has to come in legislation. Not an opinion in a ing memo

that's the dismantling?

TSA that should have been enough for you to stop trying to make a point, tbh

**spurraider21** · 02-09-2018

i mean, i'm not expecting schiff's memo to light the world on fire or anything, but this is pathetic, TSA. seriously.

**Pavlov** · 02-09-2018

Originally Posted by spurraider21

i mean, i'm not expecting schiff's memo to light the world on fire or anything, but this is pathetic, TSA. seriously.

Tell me, what's the best thing to read if I want to know about things that aren't in the memo?

**Blake** · 02-09-2018

Originally Posted by Pavlov

Tell me, what's the best thing to read if I want to know about things that aren't in the memo?

The Federalist?

**TSA** · 02-09-2018

Originally Posted by spurraider21

- Turner acknowledges that they aren't even allowed to discuss what's in the memo. So there's nothing to dismantle

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict the claim that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Why would it contradict that? That has never been disputed.

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T contradict that the court was not made aware that the DNC and Clinton campaign funded the dossier. Again, we already knew that. From what has been said, the Court was made aware in a footnote that the dossier was of a political origin or political opposition research, even if they didn't specify by name the source. And again, I think it's been learned that it is common practice to do such.

- Turner says the memo DOESN'T "say that it is okay for politically paid material to be used as evidence in a FISA court." That would be something that has to come in legislation. Not an opinion in a ing memo

that's the dismantling?

You seem to have forgotten what the Schiff memo promised to do, which was to provide additional information as a result of misrepresentation of facts in the Nunes memo, which it did not. Schiff doesn’t attempt to refute any claims in the Nunes memo.

**spurraider21** · 02-09-2018

Originally Posted by TSA

You seem to have forgotten what the Schiff memo promised to do, which was to provide additional information as a result of misrepresentation of facts in the Nunes memo, which it did not. Schiff doesn’t attempt to refute any claims in the Nunes memo.

we haven't read shiff's memo and nobody in that transcript discussed what was in it

all we have learned is that his memo does not dispute things it wasn't trying to dispute in the first place (funding of dossier, disclosure of name of source)

**TSA** · 02-09-2018

Originally Posted by spurraider21

we haven't read shiff's memo and nobody in that transcript discussed what was in it

all we have learned is that his memo does not dispute things it wasn't trying to dispute in the first place (funding of dossier, disclosure of name of source)

You seem to have forgotten what the Nunes memo claimed.