Reply With Quote
Trump cucked again
Trump cucked again
I'm sick of so much great, great winning.
Fixing DACA Trash says is a bill of love
Trash is deeply ill
Trash's "own goal" tweeting!
Trump vs. Trump, again: Judge cites presidential tweets as he blocks DACA phaseout
It’s not just the “Fake News Media” that parses President Trump’s tweets in microscopic detail and uses them against him.
Federal judges do it too.
Alsup was tasked with, among other things,
determining whether it would serve the public interest to leave DACA in place while litigation over the decision to scrap the program proceeds.
On this point, he had an easy answer:
Trump himself had expressed support for DACA on Twitter in September, just days after Department of Homeland Security officials rescinded it.
“Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!” the president wrote in a Sept. 14 tweet.
Another read:
“Congress now has 6 months to legalize DACA (something the Obama Administration was unable to do). If they can’t, I will revisit this issue!”
Donald J. Trump
✔@realDonaldTrump
Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....
4:28 AM - Sep 14, 2017
Those lines seemed to capture the program’s benefits in a nuts , Alsup wrote in a 49-page order.
“We seem to be in the unusual position wherein the ultimate authority over the agency,
the Chief Executive, publicly favors the very program the agency has ended,”
the judge wrote.
“For the reasons DACA was ins uted and for the reasons tweeted by President Trump,
this order finds that the public interest will be served by DACA’s continuation.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...nl_most&wpmm=1
Loose lips ...
Trash is playing multi-dimensional chess?
We have a DACA thread. No need to start a new thread every time Kyle Griffin farts out a tweet. I know this is exciting for you.
although i dont really get the basis here... daca was an executive order, so i dont see why it shouldn't be able to be rescinded by an executive order.
it was a pretty funny observation that Trump allowing DACA to stay up for a certain period of time after his announcement acted as an admission that the policy isn't "illegal"... because otherwise trump would be admitting he's allowing an illegal policy to remain in place for several months
main reason i see for a preliminary injunction here is the obvious irreparable harm and reliance factor, but man i cant see this winning on the merits, which is also one of the big factors in handing out these p-injunctions in the first place too.
ugh... ladyboy's gf kyle strikes again!
Are you mad at the news?
Why do you get mad at news Chris? I guess that Hillary indictment never came like you wanted.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
