Traitors of a feather flock together.
took me 5 times huh? how about the 2-3 times yesterday alone before you asked me to do so? the days, weeks, months prior to yesterday? either way, when you take care of a vietnam vet for the last yr of his life and watch him pass away in front of your eyes then you can tell me how much i care about russia. wouldn't take that yr back for nothing. greatest experience of my life tbh.
djohn and pav, yall are the fakes. yall are the pussies. the sissys. the losers trying to find a clique on the net because you never fit in in real life. yall ing losers are a dime a dozen.
Hopefully you meant to type US. Or maybe a fraudulent slip.
you're a re so of course you can't comprehend... ing re .
Faux outrage. Gross.
What is a fraudulent slip?Did you mean Freudian?
A fraudulent slip is when you were born. ShidddWhat is a fraudulent slip?
he's a re who can't even live up to the stereotype; smarts.What is a fraudulent slip?
see example above ^^^
lol always resorting to the personal attacks.
poor boohoo pav... truth hurts huh? ing pussy.
Probably cries alot too.
doubledownjohn
Steve Bannen says hi.doubledownjohn
already stated... only on mushrooms but a simple search would've told you that to begin with. need us to hold your hand for everything?
The Meltdown continues on. Lordy!
He did.
The American Trap
A theory for why Mueller didn’t directly go after Russians for violating election law
this development came with
a mystery.
The indictment alleges facts that support charges of federal campaign finance law violations—
such as the prohibition on foreign national contributions—
but does not charge any such offenses.
The special counsel may well have concluded that he could deal with any instances of U.S. citizen complicity without getting bogged down in unresolved questions of what cons utes “soliciting” support or providing the foreign national with “substantial assistance.”
In sum, Mueller and his team may have adopted this theory of the case to facilitate the charging of Americans who helped their Russian allies interfere in the 2016 election.
This is perhaps the most plausible solution to the Mueller indictment mystery.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...americans.html
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-17-2018 at 06:29 PM.
Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?
Special Counsel Robert Mueller indicted foreign citizens for trying to influence the American public about an election because those citizens did not register as a foreign agent nor record their financial expenditures to the Federal Elections Commission. By that theory, when will Mueller indict Christopher Steele, FusionGPS, PerkinsCoie, the DNC and the Clinton Campaign? Mueller’s indictment against 13 Russian trolls claimed their social media political activity was criminal because: they were foreign citizens; they tried to influence an election; and they neither registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act nor reported their funding to the Federal Elections Commission.
First, if Mueller’s theory is correct, three things make Steele a criminal: first, he is a foreign citizen; second, he tried to influence an election, which he received payments to do (including from the FBI itself); and third, he neither registered as a foreign agent nor listed his receipts and expenditures to the Federal Election Commission. Also, according to the FBI, along the way, Steele lied…a lot, while the dossier he disseminated contained its own lies based on bought-and-paid for smears from foreign sources reliant on rumors and innuendo.
Second, if Mueller’s theory is correct, three things make FusionGPS a criminal co-conspirator: it knew Steele was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission.
Third, if Mueller’s theory is correct, then three things make PerkinsCoie a potential target: it knew Steele was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission, by disguising its receipt of payments from the Clinton campaign as a “legal expense.”
Fourth, if Mueller’s theory is correct, then three things make the DNC a potential target: it knew Steele was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission, by disguising its payments to Steele as laundered legal expenses to a law firm.
Fifth, if Mueller’s theory is correct, three things make the Clinton Campaign a potential target: it knew Steele was a foreign citizen; it knew, and paid, Steele to influence an election; and it knew, and facilitated, Steele neither registering as a foreign agent nor reporting his funding from the Clinton campaign to the Federal Election Commission, by disguising its funding of payments to Steele laundered through a law firm as a “legal expense.”
Don’t expect such an indictment. Mueller chose his targets because he knows they will never appear in court, never contest the charges, and cannot be arrested or extradited as Russian citizens. Mueller’s unprecedented prosecution raises three novel arguments: first, that speaking out about American politics requires a foreign citizen to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act; second, that speaking out about American politics requires a foreign citizen list their source and expenditure of funding to the Federal Election Commission; and third, that mistakes on visa applications cons ute “fraud” on the State Department. All appear to borrow from the now-discredited “honest services” theories Mueller’s team previously used in corporate and bribery cases, cases the Supreme Court overturned for their uncons utional vagueness. The indictment raises serious issues under the free speech clause of the First Amendment and due process rights under the Fifth Amendment.
Robert Barnes is a California-based trial attorney whose practice focuses on Cons utional, criminal and civil rights law. You can follow him at @Barnes_Law.
https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/does...-chris-steele/
classic whataboutism
So they continued to manipulate you even after the election, Chris?
Thanks for admitting that.
lol
lol Russians were pro Bernie
lol Russians funded anti-Trump rallies
lol "Mueller time"
lol
"paid, Steele to influence an election"
no, Repugs and Dems both paid Steele for oppo research, which was to be used by Repugs or Dems, not Steele.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote