Reply With Quote
Make a thread on it if it's important to you.
So nothing about the 20 calls to the sheriff?
Yes. He should resign or be fired.
No. He should not resign or be fired.
So nothing about the 20 calls to the sheriff?
Make a thread on it if it's important to you.
So nothing about the 20 calls to the sheriff?
all the dead people aren't important to you after all.
Indulging your aspersion from the topic isn't important to me. Why do you make excuses for the FBI director's incompetence?
You just proved you don't give a about those dead kids, only whatever political talking point you've been ordered to make.
Sad!
I've said nothing political. I expect people in power to do their jobs, or they don't need to be in the job. You have lesser values than I.
You don't give a about the dead kids. Just politics. You proved it.
I gave a to make this thread and call for the FBI director's resignation. You're the one who has decided that your politics should take precedence. It's quite sad; but to be honest not unexpected. You're a piece of person at the end of the day.
You don't care about the 20 calls to the sheriff.
You don't care about dead kids.
Only politics-- getting rid of a guy who dared contradict Trump.
Based on the non action of the local authorities you're citing , it seems you're giving the Feds a pass. So, the issue needs to be looked at on the local level before the Fed level is what you're saying or in just this one instance?
I've never brought up Trump. But isn't it interesting that someone you perceive to be a crusader against Trump is allowed to have young blood on his hands with impunity if you get your way. Quite sad. You really are a low life.
I'm saying you don't give a about the dead kids at all.
You're saying you have no answer to my question and that you don't give a about these dead kids at all.
Pav is saying it's not the Feds' fault because of the 20 calls. Brings up Trump. LOL.
He doesn't give a about these dead kids.
That was his first post. And it was a reasonable question that you did not answer. Instead, you just made up an unsubstantiated accusation. Unless you can somehow explain how this means one does not care about dead kids at all:
Heh. Didn't read the screen name.
I'm saying there are 20 calls and one call.
Go figure.
When your first MO is to try and work your angle and schtick the expense of dead kids, you don't give a about those dead kids.
I brought up other possible calls.
I'm not calling for anyone's firing at this point.
If this is your passion, you should create an OP on it. Using it as an excuse for FBI incompetence is not acceptable though.
Is this your passion?
Because your callous politics are more important than the killing of innocents. You are quite the lowlife.
The FBI was warned last month that Nikolas Cruz was an armed psycho who might shoot up a school — but it didn’t bother investigating, the agency admitted Friday.
“A person close to” Cruz called the agency’s tipline on Jan. 5 and reported the 19-year-old had a “desire to kill people, erratic behavior, and disturbing social media posts” and there was “potential of him conducting a school shooting,” the FBI said in a statement.
But the agency said it failed to pass on any of that information to its Miami field office, even thought its own protocols say he “should have been assessed as a potential threat to life.”
A little over a month later, on Wednesday, Cruz allegedly gunned down 17 people at his former high school.
It's not your passion (obviously). It's just a convenient aspersion that I am not indulging.
What politics are you talking about?
I'm fine with waiting to see the results of the investigation. You just keep doing what you're told.
If I read the post poll directly, this is an interestingly timed yes or no question.
Nothing about further looking into.
We gotta play our cards now.
Is this your passion?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions