TSA testy today. Like he knows the jig is up...
furiously refreshing sundance tbh
Lol that large amount of conspiracy >>> is awesome
You can read the twitter thread that has credible news links to every connection. He put it all together but the connections have been reported on for years.
[qutoe=Pavlov]Yeah, he lied about his communications with Gates, who was working for the Trump campaign at the time.
That was easy.
Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?[/QUOTE]
He lied about his communications with Gates and his work with Skadden Arps, not connected to Trump.
why do you keep asking about Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?
I read enough of the thread.
But my point remains, let's work from a place where we can all gather information already confirmed via the indictments that have been handed down.
Manafort, Rick and by extension this new Swaan guy are all connected to Trump. The indictments does not point to or hints at a possible Clinton connection in the least.
lmao @ alt-right leaders. You love that fake news.
indictments? you're dreaming if you think there's gonna be any indictments.
Which led to all the lengthy prison sentences for all the people you said were going to jail over the years.
Gates is connected to Trump. Why lie about that?He lied about his communications with Gates and his work with Skadden Arps, not connected to Trump.
Because you don't answer.why do you keep asking about Nunes connected to Trump or the Clintons?
It's a simple question.
Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?
Why The Trump/Russia ‘Skeptics’ Are Wrong
the key thing. That is this:
For the second half of 2016 Donald Trump himself and his campaign knew that Russia was engaged in a wide ranging effort to subvert the 2016 campaign and to work to get him elected.
Yet despite this knowledge
he and his campaign continued to approve numerous contacts with Russian government officials, clandestine meetings, receive offers of assistance.
He also continued to push a decidedly Russia friendly policy agenda,
even to the point of
threatening to short-circuit or abandon the NATO alliance
– probably Russia’s principal foreign policy goal not only today but decades back into the Cold War.
They continued to authorize all of this, continued to feel out the possible dimensions of the relationship and, critically, made no effort to contact the FBI
or other relevant federal agencies about a plot they knew these agencies were tracking and trying to combat.
Now, key question: How do I know they knew this?
First, they knew because the Russians told them. Explicitly told them.
Second, they knew what all of us knew.
Remember: from late July through November there was a constant stream of reportage detailing Russian efforts.
At the time that was mainly tied to the theft and distribution of emails.
But the Russian use of social media bots and sock puppets as well as Russian-state owned English language media were apparent too.
A lot was public in the fall of 2016.
But the critical thing is this:
starting in August,
Donald Trump personally, as well as various high-ranking members of his team were briefed on the Russian interference effort by US intelligence and law enforcement officials.
"We know this, Mr. Trump and we want to make sure you know."
If hearing it from the Russians themselves wasn’t enough,
if seeing the numerous press reports wasn’t enough,
the US government’s intelligence leaders telling him certainly should have been. Repeatedly.
Notably, they likely included a number of key details we in the public only learned as much as a year later.
He knew. He 100% knew.
And yet they continued on with the contacts and clandestine discussions and public policy promises right up to election day and intensified them during the transition.
Not once, as far as we know, did anyone associated with the Trump campaign or Trump himself speak to anyone from law enforcement or the intelligence community and
say, “Hey, you told us about that interference campaign. This one guy contacted us and we had a few conversations with him. Just wanted you to know.”
Not once.
Of course, Trump or Jared Kushner or Paul Manafort or Don Jr might have said,
“Hey, now that you mention it, we actually took this meeting in Trump Tower in June. And someone said it was the Russian government itself trying to give us dirt. We just wanted you to know.”
Not once. None of that happened.
To me this shows a clear consciousness of guilt and
more specifically a desire to participate – ‘collaborate’ is probably the better word – in the Russian operation
out of the view of the US government which was trying to prevent it.
Note here that I haven’t even gotten into the after the fact obstruction, calling in the the Russia Foreign Minister and sharing the most closely held US intelligence secrets or the continued refusal to impose sanctions mandated overwhelmingly by Congress.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog...+%28TPMNews%29
Remember, Jared wanted to set up crypto-secret channel to Pootin, beyond the reach of FBI/NSA/CIA.
I bet Jared gave his demographic data to Mercer's Cambridge Analytics who gave it to Pootin's cyber army for targeting swing areas.
What Gates was actually indicted for isn't connected to Trump it's connected to the Clintons. Why lie about that?
Trump. What's your point?Because you don't answer.
It's a simple question.
Is Nunes connected to Trump or to the Clintons?
Except it's not. I know why you lie about that. You have to make it about the Clintons.
That is the point.Trump. What's your point?
Thanks for finally answering, pussy.
The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign. The actual indictments have nothing to do with their time on the Trump campaign and are about work done in Ukraine. The white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House both worked at Skadden Arps, who worked with Manafort.
Why did Trump hire Manafort, TSA?
Can you show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump?
Also...
Why have you used a fake name twice? What do you have to hide?
I don't know. How would I possibly know that answer to that?
"The only connection Manafort and Gates have to Trump is working for his campaign."
... and they had been connected directly or indirectly to Russia, and very probably Manafort/Gates knew Trash was connected, and vice versa.
The part with the name Richard W. Gates III.
I'm not attempting to be the primary fake name twitter source for the Clintongate du jour. I discount anonymous twitter accounts on both sides tbh.Also...
Why have you used a fake name twice? What do you have to hide?
Certainly someone with fake name tweeter account level knowledge would know how Clintoned up Manafort and Gates apparently were.
Why hire guys like that?
Last edited by Pavlov; 02-21-2018 at 03:05 PM.
To win the election. Manafort did what he was hired to do. He's a piece of , but he did what he was hired to do.
That doesn’t show the charges have anything to do with Trump. Show me in the Gates indictment where it says the charges have to do with Trump.
They are connected to Russia the same way Greg Craig (white house counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton and special counsel in the White House)/Clifford Sloan (associate White House Counsel to President were connected to Russia. Who was President and Secretary of State when these connections took place?
Big Shot Bob’s got the left completely shook with the latest indictment. He’s slowly exposing the layers.
Meanwhile 8 top ranking agents of the DOJ/FBI have been demoted or resigned due to evidence uncovered in the OIG investigation and talks of Trump/Russia collusion are dead.
democraps and repugs debating as to who has the less corrupt politicians
hole country
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
