Reply With Quote
On top of all this djohn’s going to owe me $500
And if McCabe changed the 302’s of Mike Flynn’s interview Flynn will walk free.
On top of all this djohn’s going to owe me $500
And "If". Which means you aren't sure. Your confidence is shaken.
thisdemocraps and repugs debating as to who has the less corrupt politicians
hole country
lol dead
Why do you have to reassure yourself so often, TSA?
The part with the name Richard W. Gates III.
Sorry TSA, you're trying to connect the Clintons with names so anyone else can do the same thing.
Actually he was fired in August.did you not know that?
Why was he hired over everyone else in the political world available?
According to whom?
Fake poet twitter?
THERE ARE NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS
What is the FBI hiding in its war to protect Comey?
As the James Comey saga continues to unfold, the James Comey legend continues to unravel. The more we learn about his involvement in the deep state’s illicit targeting of President Trump, the more reason the American people have to question both his motives and his management as director of the FBI, the now-disgraced agency he headed before Trump fired him on May 9, 2017. Comey has left a trail of su ious activities in his wake.
Comey now looms large over a burgeoning cons utional crisis that could soon overshadow Watergate at its worst. To deepen the crisis even further, it now appears some of Comey’s former FBI and Justice Department colleagues continue to protect him from accountability.
Three su ious activities stand out, all intertwined: the so-called Comey Memos, Comey’s controversial testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee and Comey’s book deal.
After Comey was fired by President Trump on May 9, 2017, he arranged to give The New York Times a Feb. 14, 2017, memorandum he had written about a one-on-one conversation with Trump regarding former national security adviser Michael Flynn. The New York Times published a report about the memo on May 16, 2017. Special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed the following day.
On June 8, 2017, Comey testified under oath before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, where he stated he authored as many as nine such memos. Regarding the Flynn memo, Comey admitted: “I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter [for The New York Times]. I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.”
Comey also testified about Trump’s firing of him, and he detailed multiple conversations with Trump, during which Comey confirmed he told Trump three times that he was not a target of investigation. Judicial Watch is pursuing numerous FOIA lawsuits relating to Comey’s memoranda and FBI exit records as well a lawsuit for Justice Department communications about Comey’s Senate testimony. The American people deserve to know what, if any, complicity his former colleagues had in drafting that testimony and/or in engineering the appointment of Mueller.
The day before Comey’s testimony, Fox News reported: “A source close to James Comey tells Fox News the former FBI director’s Senate testimony has been ‘closely coordinated’ with Robert Mueller.” Comey may have violated the law in leaking his official FBI memos to the media, and it would be a scandal if Comey coordinated his Senate testimony with Mueller’s special counsel office.
That we have had to sue in federal court to discover the truth speaks volumes. The FBI has built a protective stonewall around Comey by refusing to release the Comey memos and refusing to disclose records of communications between the FBI and Comey prior to and regarding Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Since his forced departure from the FBI, Comey signed a book deal in August, set for publication in April, for which he reportedly received an advance in excess of $2 million. Given the fact that the FBI appears to be letting Comey get away with stealing and leaking official government do ents and colluding with the special counsel to get Trump, even a trusting person must be su ious about his book deal.
The FBI has fanned those su ions by, you guessed it, adding a new layer to the protective stonewall around Comey. Again, Judicial Watch has been forced to sue a recalcitrant FBI for records, including but not limited to forms Comey was required to complete relating to prepublication review of the book by the FBI. Did Comey’s cronies give the fired FBI director a pass on this long-standing requirement? Is that why they are stonewalling the Judicial Watch FOIA?
Based upon Comey’s performance to date, this book likely will be an elaborate exercise in self-apotheosis. That’s why the American public deserves to know if Comey’s former colleagues — many of whom we now know aided in his exoneration of Hillary Clinton and have participated in the contrived investigation of Donald Trump — scrutinized his literary claims or simply green-lighted his every word.
There is no doubt that the deep state is in deep cover-up mode. The FBI, Justice Department and the special counsel all are stonewalling our requests for Comey do ents. The more they stonewall, the deeper the su ions grow about Comey’s complicity in the entire attempt to use the bogus Trump dossier to prevent the election of Donald Trump, and then use it to undermine his presidency once he was elected to office. In my experience in Washington, when people refuse to come clean, it is usually because they are hiding dirty laundry.
Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) is the president of Judicial Watch.
http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/...-protect-comey
lol op-ed from tom fitton being masqueraded as news
MUELLER MADNESS: Judge’s Decision RAISES NEW QUESTIONS over Flynn’s Plea Deal
A federal judge’s recent decision regarding special counsel Robert Mueller’s charges against former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn raised serious new questions about the DOJ’s probe into Russian meddling; with some calling on Flynn to withdraw his guilty plea.
The controversy began when U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras officially recused himself from the case; eventually being replaced by Judge Emmet Sullivan. Sullivan immediately ordered Mueller’s team to provide “any evidence in its possession that is favorable” to the former Trump advisor.
The judge’s request raises serious questions over whether Mueller and his team misled US officials in order to secure Flynn’s guilty plea; raising the possibility he could withdraw his admission and go to trial.
“Mueller’s team has since postponed Flynn’s sentencing. And last Wednesday, Mueller’s team filed a protective order ‘governing the production of discovery,’ which indicates they won’t fight the order to hand over do ents,” writes Fox News.
“Could this provide General Flynn with factual grounds of which he was previously unaware to seek to have his plea vacated?” asked former assistant US attorney Andrew McCarthy. “Would he have a viable legal basis to undo the plea agreement that he and his lawyer signed on November 30? We do not know at this point.”
https://www.hannity.com/media-room/m...nns-plea-deal/
Sorry Pavlov but you can't do the same thing. Gates committed those crimes when he was connected to the Clintons, not Trump.
He was working for Trump when he communicated with van der Zwaan, according to the court do ents.
Tell us what that communication has to do with the Clintons.
The ol tweet and run
Van der Zwaan's conversation with the special counsel's office in which he allegedly lied happened three days after Manafort and Gates were charged with crimes related to their work for Ukrainian politicians and other business. Both have pleaded not guilty.
In early November, prosecutors questioned van der Zwaan on his work with international law firm Skadden Arps. They were investigating Manafort's, Gates' and other individuals' compliance with the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which governs foreign lobbying and propaganda work for foreign governments in the US, and wanted to know who paid for a Ukrainian report on the trial of a former prime minister and how it was paid for, prosecutors said in court Tuesday.
Van der Zwaan spoke with the special counsel's office a second time in early December to confess to his inaccuracies and what he knew, according to prosecutors' statements in court and a plea agreement released Tuesday.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/20/polit...tes/index.html
Skadden Arps produced the report for Yanukovych. Skadden Arps employed Greg Craig, White House counsel to Obama/assistant to the President Clinton/special counsel in the White House to Clinton and Clifford Sloan, Associate White House Counsel to President Clinton.
"The prosecutors' criminal charge Tuesday explains how van der Zwaan was in touch with Gates and an unnamed colleague of Gates' who was principally based in Ukraine again in September 2016.
They discussed how a criminal complaint in Ukraine could implicate a former Ukrainian official, Skadden and Manafort himself."
Tell us what these communications had to do with Trump.
Gates was working for Trump when he communicated with van der Zwaan, according to the court do ents.Tell us what these communications had to do with Trump.
Easy questions tbh.
Then it's a good thing these "experts" aren't Robert Mueller.
Were the crimes he committed during the time he was on the Trump campaign or the time he was working with Skadden Arps?
Gates was working for Trump when he communicated with van der Zwaan, according to the court do ents.
Easy questions tbh.
CNN has been promoting Russian collusion since the story (Steele Dossier) broke. They also promote Russian funded Trump protests. Put on your thinking cap McFly. It's not hard to connect the dots unless you choose to remain willfully ignorant because of partisanship.
There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)
Posting Permissions
