Reply With Quote
Gates?
Several of them were committed when he was working for the Trump campaign. So connected to Trump.
I have no knowledge of van der Zwaan's working for any campaign and never claimed any.
Easy question tbh I wonder what is taking so long.
Gates?
Several of them were committed when he was working for the Trump campaign. So connected to Trump.
I have no knowledge of van der Zwaan's working for any campaign and never claimed any.
Hamilton68
Not an easy question. No surprise dodgerjohn refused to answer and no one else can.
Which crimes were committed when he was working for the Trump campaign? Were these crimes you claim that were committed when he was working on the Trump campaign related to his work with Skadden Arps?
I claimed Gates is connected to Trump and van der Zwaan committed his crime lying about his connection to Gates.
You haven't refuted any of it.
And you haven't proved Clinton is involved in any of this.
What crime are you accusing Clinton of here?
lol CNN promoting
Why is CNN doxing innocent people and promoting Russian funded protests?
lol harassing and doxxing. she agreed to do an interview
and she didn't really refute what he was saying... except when she went off the rails and starting saying BS, BS, BS it was hillary who colluded with russians, etc
anyone who mentions Hillary is going off the rails
*ding*
Only true pieces of post Mike Cernovich without feeling an overwhelming sense of shame.
Yes "claimed". You claimed Gates committed several crimes when he was working for the Trump campaign. I asked you specifically about Gates crimes.
I claimed Gates is connected to Trump and van der Zwaan committed his crime lying about his connection to Gates.
You haven't refuted any of it.
And you haven't proved Clinton is involved in any of this.
What crime are you accusing Clinton of here?
So which crimes were committed when he was working for the Trump campaign? Were these crimes you claim that were committed when he was working on the Trump campaign related to his work with Skadden Arps?
I never accused the Clintons of any crimes here just said the van der Zwaan indictment is connected to them.
lol harmed
Who's going to harm her?
Woman Receives Abuse, Violent Threats After CNN Tracks Down, Publicly Shames Her for Sharing ‘Russian’ Event on Facebook
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/0...t-on-facebook/
Drew Griffin and the network have not yet confronted Michael Moore, who attended a rally allegedly organized by Russians.
In July, the cable news giant hunted down a man who posted a meme on Reddit poking fun at the network. The man publicly apologized to the network.
He did.
It's all there in the indictment. Conspiracy and lying. If you have a point to any of it, use that as your source, not fake poet banned twitter.So which crimes were committed when he was working for the Trump campaign? Were these crimes you claim that were committed when he was working on the Trump campaign related to his work with Skadden Arps?
So just more bull innuendo.I never accused the Clintons of any crimes here just said the van der Zwaan indictment is connected to them.
It's more closely connected to Trump.
Because Gates.
Who worked for Trump at the time of their meeting.
You can't change it.
Sorry.
Is she alive? If so check mark.
You see, when someone on the left goes out for a peaceful protest, they get run down with cars and killed. Tolerant right.
So she's filing reports with the FBI, right?
You have yet to address, even remotely, Hamilton's methodology. Your ad hominems are remarkably easy to dismiss.
"dur, bored member bad, dur".
Jeez, dude, here's a napkin for the saliva you have dribbling from your chin.
muh Hillary
She lost, get over it.
She's being investigated. No Comey to cover everything up this time. Going to be an interesting year rife with revelations.muh Hillary
She lost, get over it.
Were these crimes you claim that were committed when he was working on the Trump campaign related to his work with Skadden Arps yes or no?
Seems like a fairly reasonable way to get at a network, assuming that the push was coordinated with other state-controlled Russian media."These accounts were selected for their relationship to Russian-sponsored influence and disinformation campaigns, and not because of any domestic political content. The initial dashboard tracks 600 accounts that were
1) identified as participating in specific disinformation campaigns synchronized with Russia Today and Sputnik News,
2) meaningfully linked to users who self-identified as promoting pro-Russian viewpoints, and
3) bots that provide support to members of the first two categories.
We have monitored these datasets for months in order to verify their relevance to Russian disinformation programs targeting the United States. Russian influence operations targeting other audiences, such as in France and Germany, usually have different but overlapping content."
Feel free to put forth a specific critique of the method, or even more funny, present one of your own.
I did address their methodology along with the makeup of their team, that's why I get to
Twitter and Facebook also
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
