he's not that concerned with issues. he just wants to rub your goty liberal face in his .
smh
That is what, not why. Use your own words. Remember, I can't see the crayon scratching you put on the monitor, you will have to type it out.
he's not that concerned with issues. he just wants to rub your goty liberal face in his .
That is what, not why.
Lazy copy pasta.
Use your own words. Why should I give a single about uranium one?
idgaf about U1, Russia, NK, PC politics, etc... i just like seeing the discourse of this thread and many others like it.
don't be so quick... i know what the U1 scandal is but don't care.
maybe you can write it in code and i will better understand it. Js is preferred.
well, duh.
I haven't quite put him on ignore, but I have stopped paying attention. Dude is his own worst enemy.
BECAUSE MONEY WENT TO CHARITY
WE CANNOT LET THIS STAND
RandomGoalPostMoverTourettesGuy
what's below average, average, and above average to you? i bet you vastly overestimate yourself random. set that ego free!
you finally ing get it!
you haven't stopped paying attention... this thread is case in point! don't lie to yourself like you lie to all of us.
Didn't move the goal posts at all.
I am asking you to say why this is a scandal at all, which you don't seem to be able to do.
So it isn't a scandal to you, or you don't understand it. I lean on the latter.
its been clear for quite some time.
Someone gave some money to charity. That sums it up.
I can see why board conservatives would have a problem. That charity money didn't go to rich CEOs.
lol he asked "why" both times
That’s on you to give a or not.
lol not getting it
lol not reading the difference between "why is it a scandal" and "why should I give a "
@ the new why should I give a line
So Uranium One is supposed to be some sort of scandal, but you have no clue why.
![]()
You don't know why either.
"Look at this thing that happened".
"okay, why is that a problem?"
"UR so dumb"
If it were easy to explain you would have done it by now. The only reasonable thing to conclude is that you don't know why, which I find hilarious.
keep running from the question.
Informant had no evidence Clinton benefited from uranium sale: Democrats
An informant whom House Republicans have said could reveal a link between a 2010 sale of U.S. uranium supplies and donations to the Clinton Foundation provided no evidence of that during a four-hour interview with congressional staff last month, Democrats said on Thursday.
The informant, lobbyist William D. Campbell,
“provided no evidence of a quid pro quo involving Secretary (Hillary) Clinton or the Clinton Foundation and no evidence that Secretary Clinton was involved in, or improperly influenced” the uranium sale,
the Democrats said in a five-page summary of the Feb. 7 interview.
Democrats said they were releasing a summary of the session because majority
Republicans, who control the panels, refused to provide a full transcript.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...litics+News%29
Repugs and ST assholes get huge hardons, then pfffft, erectible dysfunction
Hannity just confirmed FBI in Arkansas is investigating Clinton Foundation.
Let me know when Trump reverses the deal and takes the business back from the Russians.
Yeah, OK.
@ pretending to care about the law, but only when he thinks Democrats are involved
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)