Reply With Quote
Nope. Sorry.Nunes: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page
Nunes: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page
The FBI may have violated criminal statutes, as well as its own strict internal procedures, by using unverified information during the 2016 election to obtain a surveillance warrant on onetime Trump campaign aide Carter Page, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee charged Thursday in a letter obtained by Fox News.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., wrote in his letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that “in this instance, it’s clear that basic operating guidance was violated.”
Nunes cited the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide (DIOG), which was created by the bureau and approved by the Justice Department, to say he believed the FBI violated procedures requiring verified and do ented evidence in applications to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
An Oct. 2011 version of the operations guide states that the “accuracy of information contained within FISA applications is of utmost importance... Only do ented and verified information may be used to support FBI applications to the court.”
The guidance also states that information in a FISA application must be “thoroughly vetted and confirmed.”
A memo released by the intelligence committee last month stated that the FBI and DOJ sought surveillance warrants to spy on Page by using an infamous, Democrat-funded anti-Trump dossier that included salacious and unverified allegations about Trump's connections to Russia.
HOUSE MEMO: DOSSIER WAS KEY TO FBI'S FISA WARRANT FOR CARTER PAGE
“Former and current DOJ and FBI leadership have confirmed to the committee that unverified information from the Steele dossier comprised an essential part of the FISA applications related to Carter Page,” Nunes wrote Thursday.
Nunes listed five criminal statues that were possibly violated, including conspiracy, obstruction of justice, contempt of court. It also cites statues that make it a crime to willfully deprive a person of a right protected by the Cons ution and another preventing unauthorized electronic surveillance.
In the letter, Nunes asks Sessions whether these protocols requiring verified information have changed, and if not, what steps the DOJ or FBI taken to hold officials behind the Page application accountable.
The letter is carbon copied to FBI Director Christopher Wray and DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
Fox News has requested comment from the FBI, the Justice Department and the House Democrats on the Intelligence Committee.
Sessions acknowledged this week that Horowitz is probing the cir stances of the surveillance of Page.
SESSIONS: DOJ IG TO PROBE FISA ABUSE ALLEGATIONS
“We believe the Department of Justice must adhere to the high standards in the FISA court,” Sessions said during a news conference Tuesday. “Yes it will be investigated. And I think that's just the appropriate thing the inspector general will take that as one of the matters he'll deal with.”
That admission, though, put Sessions back in President Trump’s crosshairs Wednesday, with the president referring to Horowitz as an “Obama guy” and calling Sessions’ decision “disgraceful.”
House Intelligence Committee Republicans and Democrats have argued over whether the dossier was a primary or secondary element of the surveillance application.
Democrats released a rebuttal memo on Sunday, saying the dossier was corroborated by multiple sources.
But in his June 2017 testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee, then-FBI Director Jim Comey said he still considered the dossier “unverified” and “salacious” three months after the October 2016 surveillance warrant was granted.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...rter-page.html
Nope. Sorry.Nunes: FBI may have violated criminal statutes in FISA application to spy on Trump adviser Carter Page
That’s why Sessions publicly ordered IG Horowitz to investigate it right?
Live look at djohn2oo8 and crew
Yet you never said what you think the charges will be. Pussy. Pizzagate got you with your tail between dem legs.That’s why Sessions publicly ordered IG Horowitz to investigate it right?
Live look at djohn2oo8 and crew
TSA theory
stop being a pussy, TSA, name the charges"It's over"
who is it over for?
what will they be charged with?
Stop being a pussy. Name names.
“I’m told”
Thanks for providing more evidence for my theory you fool.
Why would Sessions publicly order Horowitz to investigate the FISA warrant? Why would Trump tweet an “attack” on Sessions/Horowitz the next day? Why would Nunes request to Sessions come out the day after that?
It’s obvious where this is headed and the slow roll out to the public has begun. Horowitz report comes out this month. Your entire world is about to be flipped upside down.
Name. A. Charge.
Unnamed sources bad now.
TSA
Unnamed sources bad now.
Don't know about you guys but I just can't get away from all of these stories in the media defending Sessions and Horowitz.
where is the quote from butowsky?
Jesus Christ. What a lunatic that guy is. Puts TSA to shame.
Also Opinion piece.
Also no quotes from said guy.
I read the entire article. There's no quote attributable to Butowsky.
"in his discussions with Joel and Mary Rich"
Make sense now?
That's not a quote from Butowsky. That's a quote from the author.
You're asking for something that doesn't tangibly exist yet afaik. Make sense now?
Yeah that was actually my point entirely.
Quit being so passive aggressive then and just make your damn point. Pretty disingenuous imo
wasnt disingenuous. asked if there was an actual butowsky quote since mr dotcom seemed so excited by these new devleopments
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
