Reply With Quote
"I believe in the rule of law"
Bull you do.
Nothing was classified, had you read the article you posted you’d already know that. So what were the terms of our bet?
"I believe in the rule of law"
Bull you do.
TSA is the sole arbiter of what is worthy of discussion and with whom.
Australian Amb. Who Prompted Trump-Russia Probe Has Decade Long Relationship To Clintons – Jim Jordan Wants Answers (And A Second Special Counsel)
http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/06/au...-russia-probe/
It means absolutely nothing. Just more innuendo.
All part of the plan. Plead guilty, spill your guts, sell your home to pay for legal fees.
Stingiest operation ever. Obama's ed now.
FBI gets tips, BUYS tips, from wherever.
thats a lot of attorney fees for a process crime
"Talks to Jim Jordan"
The end.
What law was broken RG?"I believe in the rule of law"
Bull you do.
Emily Hytha, a spokesperson for Rep. Michael Conaway, who is supervising the probe, said witness testimony was not shared improperly. (The testimony was deemed committee-sensitive, according to a committee source, but not classified.)
“Any accusation that a witness's testimony was shared with another witness or their lawyer is unequivocally false,” she said.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-...mpression=true
"In the spring of 2016, Orbis Business Intelligence—a small investigative-research firm that Steele and a partner had founded, in 2009, after leaving M.I.6, Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service—had agreed to do opposition research on Trump’s murky relationship with Russia. Under the arrangement, Orbis was a subcontractor working for Fusion GPS, a private research firm in Washington. Fusion, in turn, had been contracted by a law firm, Perkins Coie, which represented both Hillary Clinton’s Presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Several months after Steele signed the deal, he learned that, through this chain, his research was being jointly subsidized by the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C. In all, Steele was paid a hundred and sixty-eight thousand dollars for his work."
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...-trump-dossier
So who's lying the FBI, Christopher Steele, or Glenn Simpson?
neither? Steele may have learned who was funding the research, but didn't specifically have to be Simpson (U.S. Person) that informed him
cue but her emails.exe
Aw Poor Flynn.
you're way ahead of us, given this *ding* in the russia thread
You should read the articles Pavlov.
Joe Flynn and other family members set up a defense fund for Flynn to collect donations from supporters. He wouldn't disclose how much has been raised, but he said the family has been surprised and deeply moved by the thousands of individual donations they've received, none of which came from foreign nationals or from Flynn's former boss, Trump.
cue ding.exe /emoticon
The Newsweek article lists several things that were verified. The BBC link another. The standard set by ConservativeCowboy was that none of the dossier could be verified.So when you said the FBI has said they have independently verified much of what was in the dossier by much you really meant just one thing
The FBI investigation has been tight lipped I never claimed that my post was exhaustive. Good to see you are still dumb as and struggle to follow a conversation or determine key points. You can eat too.
"The identified U.S. Person never advised Source #1 as to the motivation behind the research into Candidate #1’s ties to Russia"
Who are all the people in the quotes?
But he still have to sell det house?
Youre right that many of the things in the dossier are obvious nowadays. That is why your blanket dismissal of the whole thing was monumentally stupid. You are parroting Fox News talking point like a good minion though.
That was just the first two entries I found on a google search. You were not only wrong but obviously wrong because of your partisan nature. Shouldn't you be eating now, fattie?
NO IT MUST BE A CONSPIRACY!
"To serve its clients, Orbis employs dozens of confidential “collectors” around the world, whom it pays as contract associates. Some of the collectors are private investigators at smaller firms; others are investigative reporters or highly placed experts in strategically useful jobs. Depending on the task and the length of engagement, the fee for collectors can be as much as two thousand dollars a day."
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...-trump-dossier
"The ex-British intelligence agent who authored the opposition research dossier on President Donald Trump and Russia did not pay the sources he used to compile the do ent, Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson testified to congressional Russia investigators, multiple sources familiar with the matter told CNN."
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/15/polit...ier/index.html
This New Yorker piece is exposing some interesting inconsistencies.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
