I personally don't know. I've only read the Fox account that said he started in 2009.
EDIT: looks like he's still working for him. Now what is your conspiracy theory here, TSA?
Started in 2009. Don't know or care if he is currently lobbying for Deripaska. Deripaska was his client when the texts were exchanged.
Why was Deripaska's lobbyist texting Senator Warner telling him that Christopher Steele wanted to talk to him?
Why was Warner concerned about leaving a paper trail of their contacts?
He probably knows Steele.
Republican leaks.Why was Warner concerned about leaving a paper trail of their contacts?
What is your conspiracy here, TSA?
Why did the presidential campaign hide the payments for the opposition research?
Jeez. He is on his knees now.
Why was a presidential campaign meeting with an adversary for stolen information?
Define "hide" and post your conspiracy theory.
So your proof (as someone who regularly posts Donald Trump tweets, gets his information from 4chan and ar15.com, and generally assumes the same position verbatim as Russian troll farms) is an appeal to the lack of credibility among the sources.
Okaylol
This is a Spurtacularly bad take.
a) this is absolutely a goal post move. my point was entirely about the bombs reports of judge sullivan's standing order to turn over exculpatory evidence and how that was supposed to mean the guilty plea was going to be void or some like that... you haven't addressed what i posted at all with these questions
b) we dont know why contreras recused himself. the reason was never disclosed, nor would it be in the ordinary course of business
Judge Emmet Sullivan was randomly assigned to take over the case after Judge Rudolph Contreras recused himself.
A court spokeswoman confirmed to POLITICO that the reassignment was due to Contreras' recusal, but said the court generally does not disclose the reason that a judge begged off the case.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...tencing-287001
c) they also pushed back the papodopolous sentencing hearing (https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/17/polit...los/index.html)
this is all we really know
Such a delay in sentencing, according to a former high-ranking Justice Department official, is common in federal investigations.
(http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...entencing.html)“This is very, very common for a cooperating defendant,” the former official, James Trusty who served under both the Bush and Obama administrations, told Fox News. “They don’t want to tell the judge to sentence Flynn until they can tell the judge that he helped in the case.”
Trusty said that if Flynn were ever asked to testify in a trial, he would be “a better witness” if still facing the prospect of sentencing.
Flynn could be sentenced to federal prison for up to five years for making false statements to the FBI.
“It’s a routine play that federal sentencing gets put off until you’re done cooperating,” Trusty said, adding that thisdoes not give any insight into the “pace” of Mueller’s probe, but rather the “existence of it.”
“They are basically saying ‘we may use Flynn for more information,’ but who knows where they think he fits in the grand scheme of the investigation,” Trusty said. “They obviously think he still has some potential, affirmative work to do.”
Trash and peepee in Vegas kompromat
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...-might-be-real
It wasn’t.
Why did the presidential campaign hide the payments for the opposition research?
Hide= having Perkins Coie pay Fusion GPS so the campaign wouldn’t have to disclose where the payment went and for what reason.
Why did the presidential campaign hide the payments for the opposition research?
It did. Or else they wouldn't have lied about adoptions
Yeah, that doesn't really meet the definition of "hide."
The payments to Perkins-Coie for opposition research were reported. If you have instances of every subcontractor payment's being reported by a campaign, by all means post it.
It's your claim that they should have as a matter of course -- prove it.
Also, post your dossier conspiracy.
Dumbest mother s on the planet
Mueller doesn't need the interview to take him. Dis gonna end ugly for cheeto jesus.
Amazing.
Did Russia Tell Trump To Constantly About The 2016 Election Being #RIGGED? We Are Just Asking Questions!
On Thursday, Mother Jones released an excerpt from a new book by its reporter David Corn, along with Yahoo News reporter Michael Isikoff, about the whole damn story of Russian interference in the 2016 election to elect Donald Trump, based on what we know so far and their own exclusive reporting. It was JUICY, because it was all about how Trump loves pee so much, or more specifically, it was about what really happened during Trump’s 2013 Moscow Miss Universe pageant. Today, MoJo released the second excerpt, and it is totally different from the first! For one thing, there’s hardly any Trump pee in it! But listen, that doesn’t mean it’s boring.
...
Therefore, their greatest concern was that Russia would cause general election-day chaos and mayhem, against the backdrop of a Russo-Republican candidate named Donald J. Trump who was CONSTANTLY ing and moaning that the election would be #RIGGED.
Reading this, we started to wonder:
Is it possible Russia somehow signaled Trump to about election rigging early and often, on the assumption that Hillary Clinton was ultimately going to win anyway, regardless of how successful their various hacking operations were?
Would that have been a triumph for Russia, part of the damage it hoped to inflict on an incoming President Hillary Clinton, to have millions of low information Trump voters absolutely convinced the Deep State had stolen their votes and given them to the blacks the Messicans Hillary?
We are just curious.
On the other hand, Trump did stare at a TV camera in late summer of 2016 and beg Russia to find Hillary’s mythical 33,000 missing emails, in an act of in-your-face collusion. Based on that behavior, we are JUST WONDERING AND WILDLY SPECULATING over whether one of the Russian agent cut-outs in Trump’s campaign told him he should really talk a lot about election rigging, so that when/if Hillary won, it would still be MISSION ACCOMPLISHED for the Kremlin. Putin was trying to sow chaos and distrust, after all.
You don’t know, could have happened.
And if Russia was able to do bad things to state election systems — “delete every 10th name” in a voter registration database or “flip two digits in a voter’s ID number,” as Corn and Isikoff write — it could throw Election Day into pandemonium, against the backdrop of a Donald Trump pre-emptively whining his ing orange off about election rigging, and a right-wing tinfoil hat industrial complex ready and willing to exacerbate the chaos.
Seriously, does anyone think Alex Jones and Sean Hannity wouldn’t have ed that chicken to death, then given it to Donald Trump for post-death ing? Please.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/631011/did-russ...ARXsiQCvlz5.99
Why do they want it to end?
Dumbest mother s on the planet
Mueller doesn't need the interview to take him. Dis gonna end ugly for cheeto jesus.
Mueller is going to bring down Clinton once and for all -- no reason to stop him.
Anybody care to ask what RT and Sputnick were saying about the election before Trump won... and what they quit talking about immediately after Trump won?
hint: it rhymes with fligged...
Dumbest mother s on the planet
Mueller doesn't need the interview to take him. Dis gonna end ugly for cheeto jesus.
What stolen information did try to receive?
Amazing.
Were the payments to Perkins Coie listed as opposition research yes or no?
TSA i know you're putting out fires all over the place... but still waiting on your response re: flynn plea withdrawal
I don't know TBH. I'm sure you'll tell me and I'm sure you will provide evidence that every other law firm ever tasked with oppo research was noted in every spending report.
I'll wait for that.
Also, post your dossier conspiracy theory.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
