Reply With Quote
CC with the 20 year old ding.
Also Venezuela good now.
Next thing you know they will be renting out the Lincoln Bedroom.
CC with the 20 year old ding.
Also Venezuela good now.
taking spy wars to mainstream media
What a disgrace
Which side are you on this morning?
lol Russian oligarchs melting down all over the place.
Probably a KGB agent working for Putin
Mueller is on it
Someone call 1-800-MUELLER-TIME
Why would anyone call Mueller about that Russian melting down, hater?
Both sides are going to scramble to make this fit their narratives:
This is crazy.
“Theres Russian Trolls... in your neighboorhood”
“Who you gonna call?”
“Rob Mueller!!!”
Deedoo deedooo deedooo deedooo
“i aint afraid of no troll”
“I hear it likes Trump”
“I aint afraid of no troll”
“Yeah yeah yeah yah”
“Who you gonna call?”
“Rob Mueller!”
You weren't kidding about crazy. Holy .
Let’s stop for a second and take that in. On the first page of the dossier, Steele claims to have gotten senior Russian officials and their trusted friends to chit-chat about a secret plan crafted for five years by no less than Putin himself. Given the relative trivialities that can get one beaten to death in a Russian prison, these senior officials would seem to have exhibited an extraordinarily cavalier at ude toward their own health and well-being.
Is it plausible? One skeptic is an American journalist with a decade’s experience working in Moscow. He points out the obvious: It can be dangerous to be a reporter in Russia and difficult to get sources with real information to share it. People asking questions of top officials and their associates don’t go unnoticed in Putin’s surveillance state, whether it’s someone on the phone from England or just a nosy local. “Nobody Steele could have sent or talked to could have done so without it immediately coming to the attention of Russian internal security,” says the journalist.
From the earliest days of the dossier inquiry, Russian security services would have had at least a couple of options: (1) They could have shut Steele down immediately, or (2) they could have taken the opportunity to feed him stories contrived to cause the most chaos and damage to the United States. The journalist says, “Whatever is in the dossier is there because Russia wanted it in the dossier.” Unless, he adds, Steele just made things up and never had any serious Russian sources for the material in the first place.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/a-dooz...rticle/2011865
rest at link, good read.
Nothing in it can be true! It just can't be!
So everyone in Trump's inner circle has committed perjury. Nice.
So many adoptions....
Former DNI James Clapper Allegedly Leaked to CNN, investigation revealed
House Intelligence Committee finds no evidence of Trump Russia collusion
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper allegedly leaked information to CNN in early last year regarding the classified briefing given to then President-Elect Donald Trump and President Barrack Obama on the salacious dossier and its contents claiming the Russians had compromising information on the president-elect, according to government sources, who noted the evidence of the leak was collected during the House Intelligence Committee’s Russia investigation.
Clapper, who was one of four senior Obama administration officials to attend the briefing with the presidents, also stated his “profound dismay at the leaks” in an official statement issued in January, 2017 and warned that the leaks were “extremely corrosive and damaging” to national security, according to the press release.
Texas Republican Mike Conaway, R-Texas, announced Monday in a press release, that the committee found no evidence of Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. The Republican members released only a portion of the committee’s findings in the late afternoon. The full report will undergo a full review to ensure that it does not reveal or damage national security before its public release that could happen within the next several weeks, congressional sources added. The committee interviewed its final witness former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski last week and had accessed all do ents related to its probe, a congressional source told this reporter.
“We’ve interviewed all the folks we needed too,” Conaway told Fox New Monday. “We could find no evidence of collusion between either campaign and the Russians.”
Conaway added, that the committee found evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
“Near the start of the HPSCI investigation into Russian active measures during the 2016 election, the Committee majority and minority agreed to four parameters for this investigation, covering Russian active measures directed against the 2016 election and against our European allies, the U.S. Government’s response to those attacks, links between Russians and the Trump and Clinton campaigns, and leaks of classified information,” Conaway stated.
“After conducting 73 witness interviews, holding nine hearings and briefings, and reviewing over 300,000 do ents, we are confident that we have thoroughly investigated the agreed-upon parameters, and developed reliable initial findings and recommendations,” he said. “We will now be moving into the next phase of this investigation, working with the minority on a report to give the American people answers to the questions they’ve been asking for over a year.”
Conaway said that with the2018 primary elections already underway, “just 238 days until the mid-term elections in November, it’s important that we give the American people the information they need to arm themselves against Russian attempts to influence our elections.”
But according to government sources Clapper, who is not mentioned in the report released Monday, had spoken to CNN at roughly the same time Jake Tapper broke the first story on CNN regarding the briefing conducted by senior Obama officials with then President-elect Trump and President Obama regarding the dossier.Tapper’s story which was published in January 2017, created a snowball effect of allegations in the media that Trump’s campaign had allegedly colluded with the Russians in the 2016 election and that Russia had compromising material on Trump, sources with knowledge of the investigation concluded.
Clapper was one of four senior Obama administration officials to brief Obama and Trump on the dossier in December 2016. FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan and National Security Administration Director Mike Rogers were also present at the December briefings.
Neither Clapper or Tapper could not be immediately reached for comment.
The dossier, which was compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele, at the behest of embattled research firm Fusion GPS, was already being shopped around by Steele to journalists in Washington as early as the summer of 2016, according to reports. At the time, journalists who had heard of the dossier were reluctant to publish the findings because of its unverified content.
“[Clapper] gave the dossier legs and news agencies began to publish its contents because it had now become official news…”
But it was when CNN published the first report that Trump and Obama had been briefed the dossier’s findings that other news agencies began to report on it. The committee found evidence that Clapper, who is now a contributor at CNN, contacted CNN shortly before the story was published by Tapper, Evan Perez, and Jim Sciutto. The story detailed the briefings given to Trump by the senior officials on the contents of the dossier and “gave the dossier legs and news agencies began to publish its contents because it had now become official news,” one congressional source told this reporter. Shortly after CNN published the report, Buzzfeed made the decision to post the entire 35-page dossier and referenced the CNN report in its decision to publish it, according to the website.
On Jan. 11, Clapper issued a press release stating that the leaks in the media regarding the briefing on the dossier were “extremely corrosive and damaging to national security.”
“I expressed my profound dismay at the leaks that have been appearing in the press, and we both agreed that they are extremely corrosive and damaging to our national security,” he stated. “We also discussed the private security company do ent, which was widely circulated in recent months among the media, members of Congress and Congressional staff even before the IC became aware of it. I emphasized that this do ent is not a U.S. Intelligence Community product and that I do not believe the leaks came from within the IC.”
“The IC has not made any judgment that the information in this do ent is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions,” Clapper stated. “However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.”
CNN was the first to report that the Russians allegedly had “compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.”
CNN also reported that the findings were compiled by a credible former British spy and that the FBI was investigating the allegations. The official sources also told CNN that one reason they wanted to brief Trump on the unverified information is that it had been circulating among the media.
At a Senate Intelligence hearing on June 8, 2017, after Comey was fired, the former FBI director revealed told Sen. Susan Collin’s under questioning that when he spoke to Trump on Jan. 6, 2017 he wanted the president to know “I was briefing him about the salacious and unverified material. It was in a context of that that he had a strong and defensive reaction about that not being true. My reading of it was it was important for me to assure him we were not person investigating him.”
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-CA, had battled both Democrats and the Department of Justice for past year during to obtain do ents for the Russia phase of the investigation. The Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee are expected to release their own findings later this month that will state that more investigations are needed into alleged collusion with the Russian, according to reports.
The verdict is inlol djohn2oo8
Quiet up in here
wow, partisan congressional committee findings
House dem report will say the same except then call for more investigations.
How do you know this?
Of course it won't say the same because the Russians did meddle. This report is saying no Russian meddling happened period which is just looney stuff. There is plenty evidence the Russians stuck their beak in.
tick tock
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
