Reply With Quote
Who are you?
Y'all are 2 peas, different pods. But, fwiw, TSA shows more independent thinking ability than Liberal Chris does.
Who are you?
OOO, a no one doing a cred call out. Wayyyy harsh...Go post some more of your master's tweets, you narrow minded twit.
Either way, you're no smarter than Chris.
I haven't seen a shred of proof shown by you in this entire thread. Show me one single piece of evidence that Trump and Russia colluded to sway the election.Showed you 10,000 times. And then you said no one would be indicted except Susan Rice.
Can you put that in your sig?
You know what I will put in my sig when this is over? djohn2oo8 is a gullible who paid me $500 because of his gullibility or djohn2oo8 is a gullible and a pathetic welsher.
Damn sons, Pizzagate got this nig on a nervous breakdown. Just look at him go
But TSA said Democrats would all come and accept the findings. Wrong again wow.
who gives a about swaying an election? if you do, then you're upset about hillary. i'm never upset about hillary.
i want them to follow the money. all of it. him and her.
and we didnt get a pepperoni slice of proof for pizzagate
Winner, winner, chicken dinner.
Adam Schiff would have leaked this evidence as soon as he saw it. He doesn't have and this Dem report is going to be more embarrassing than their attempted Nunes rebuttal.
Yet you said Democrats would come to support GOP conclusion. Incorrect. Like Pizzagate.Adam Schiff would have leaked this evidence as soon as he saw it. He doesn't have and this Dem report is going to be more embarrassing than their attempted Nunes rebuttal.
tick tock
TSA bullying dodgerjohn in the paint. Chucho talking again. clambake spams tick tock for the 500th time. Pavlov avoiding this thread like the plague.
they gonna dig through his numbers.
tick tock
lol avoiding.
"Committee headed by member of Trump transition executive committee clears Trump"
So Mueller good, but anyone having anything to do with Trump bad? Got it.
Prince was thrown into the middle of Russiagate after an April 3, 2017 Washington Post story reported his meeting with the Russian banker. But how did anyone know about the meeting? After the story came out, Prince said he was shown “specific evidence” by sources from the intelligence community that the information was swept up in the collection of electronic communications and his iden y was unmasked. The US official or officials who gave his name to the Post broke the law when they leaked classified intelligence. “Unless The Washington Post has somehow miraculously recruited the bartender of a hotel in the Seyc es,” Prince told the House Intelligence Committee in December, “the only way that’s happening is through SIGINT [signals intelligence].”
"Mueller presumably knows whether Prince’s name was indeed unmasked and then leaked to the press—and that the leak was a crime. Mueller certainly knows that most of the case he has regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election was built by abuses of the foreign intelligence surveillance apparatus and other related crimes that are punishable with jail time. The iden y of Trump’s short-tenured National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was swept up and leaked to the press in the same way as Prince’s. It was leaked to the same newspaper, the Washington Post.
As I explained last week, the iden y of Attorney General Jeff Sessions was also unmasked from intelligence intercepts and leaked to the Washington Post. The fact that the FBI had secured a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant on Carter Page was also leaked to the Post. The warrant on Page was secured on the basis of the findings in the Steele dossier, an unverified piece of opposition research paid for by the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee."
"The press also has an interest in prolonging the Mueller probe. Russiagate is good for business, mesmerizing viewers with a grand political spectacle featuring one of the media’s biggest draws for the last several decades—Donald Trump, the boss villain who is now in the White House. Maybe most prominent among the interested media organizations is the paper that has colluded with lawbreakers in publishing the names of US persons whose iden ies have been illegally leaked by intelligence officials and political operatives—the Washington Post.
Coincidentally, the owner of the Post also has a major stake in letting Mueller do his work to preserve America’s surveillance and spying complex. In 2013, the same year that Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos bought the paper that broke Watergate for $250 million, Amazon Web Services landed a $600 million deal with the US intelligence community. According to a 2017 Washington Post story, AWS created a “cloud storage service designed to handle classified information for U.S. spy agencies,” including the CIA. The cloud technology was to “usher in a new era of cooperation and coordination, allowing agencies to share information and services much more easily.”
And now some intelligence and data experts believe that the CIA cloud is how the Obama administration could have minimized its trail after unmasking US persons. “The NSA database, with its large and ongoing collection of electronic communications, can be accessed through the NSA’s cloud,” says one former senior intelligence official. The NSA can audit it and find out if analysts are violating rules. The NSA does not audit the CIA’s cloud, which is audited by the CIA’s IT people and Amazon Web Services employees who are given security clearances. Says the former official: “There are people in the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Security Council staff who can move information from the NSA cloud into the CIA cloud. That seems the likeliest scenario to explain how Obama officials first unmasked US persons and then shared information without leaving a trail that could be audited independently, or immediately, at every step. Since unmasking, by itself, is authorized for lawful purposes, it’s the processing and sharing, as with Susan Rice’s spreadsheets, that tell us if the information was being misused.”
http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/2573...ltway-cover-up
Nunes had a profound and obvious conflict of interest.
Not even you could deny that.
Leaks bad now.
Also: new conspiracies!
Oh conflicts of interest are bad now?Doubt Nunes has any. Funny when we were pointing at Mueller's, you could care less.
Oh conflicts of interest are bad now?
I bet you can't even remember what you were whining about without Googling.Funny when we were pointing at Mueller's, you could care less.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
