lol Pizzagate, Seth Rich, Susan Rice, Wiretapping Presidents, Flynn guilty plea have all defeated that boy to where he won't give his theories anymore.
I can question the official story and not have an alternate theory.
You opened up this rabbit hole about the FISA court and information outside the Steele dossier so it will be embarrassing if you try and back your way out of discussing it.
It's okay though, I can understand why a person who claimed the FBI was presenting information to the FISA court about George Papadopolous to secure a FISA warrant on Carter Page wouldn't want to continue talking about such a ridiculous claim.
None of that matters. I got your gullible ass to bet me $500 that I will surely win.
OK, let us know when your alternative theory is delivered.
Because you have a good history of winning bets, which is why you aren't posting from your main account.
Will do.OK, let us know when your alternative theory is delivered.
In the meantime you opened up this rabbit hole about the FISA court and information outside the Steele dossier so it will be embarrassing if you try and back your way out of discussing it.
It's okay though, I can understand why a person who claimed the FBI was presenting information to the FISA court about George Papadopolous to secure a FISA warrant on Carter Page wouldn't want to continue talking about such a ridiculous claim.
If you think it was a warrant for someone else, you can state who you think that is.
But you won't.
how do you keep the bet straight with all the goalpost moves?
I've won 100% of money bets made on Spurstalk.
im not surprised that the parties involved would deny it. to this day the russians deny any involvement with the election... and wikileaks has lost any appearance of neutrality
neither the statement of the affense nor the affidavit in support say anything about a preview of the contents, so you are correct there. they do show that he had knowledge of their possession of thousands of emails, though.
you can go ahead and repeat the questions over and over again if you want. i do it to you because you are incredibly bold with your claims, constantly push your ever-evolving narratives, and then later when we get information that directly contradicts your narrative, you squirm and shift goalposts.
How many money bets have you made here?
I think it's a bull claim from Schiff. Explain how and why the FBI would be presenting information about Papadopolous to secure a FISA warrant on Page. The two of them are not connected.
So was Schiff's claim accurate yes or no? If no, did Schiff's memo produce evidence of Trump/Russia collusion as promised?im not surprised that the parties involved would deny it. to this day the russians deny any involvement with the election
neither the statement of the affense nor the affidavit in support say anything about a preview of the contents, so you are correct there. they do show that he had knowledge of their possession of thousands of emails, though.
Hmm. Papadopoulos wants to set up a meeting between Russians and Trump campaign.
Page visits Russia when he was part of the Trump campaign.
Nope. No possible relation!
his memo said the russians previewed the release of the emails. is that taken to mean that he was shown the emails, or told that they would release them. you're right that he ambiguously worded it. to my knowledge, there is nothing publicly available that would back the assertion that he was shown the emails. that said papa's knowledge of emails possession by russia qualifies as evidence (not proof) of collusion, imo.
Papadopolous and Page have no relation.
Hmm. Papadopoulos wants to set up a meeting between Russians and Trump campaign.
Page visits Russia when he was part of the Trump campaign.
Nope. No possible relation!
So right back to exactly what I said yesterday. Schiff rehashing public reports on George Papadopolous is not presenting evidence of Trump/Russia collusion.
i disagree that rehashing evidence is not presenting evidence
So this is the information that you think secured the FISA warrant on Page?
Repug dirty trickster Roger Stone in contact with Pootin's puppet Assange.
June 16 meeting in Trump Tower so DJTJr could obtain Pootin's dirt on DNC/Hillary
etc, etc, etc.
Why the did JeBo lie about his multiple contacts with Russians?
I'm sure Mueller / Schneiderman have even more than overwhelming cir stantial evidence.
Trash will be forced to testify before one or more Grand Juries for actions BEFORE he was Pres, just like Slick Willy.
The information they got from Australia? Yes. I do believe that was used as part of the FISA application.So this is the information that you think secured the FISA warrant on Page?
There is one degree of separation between Papadopolous' request and Page's trip. This isn't rocket science. I don't know why it's so hard for you to understand.
I disagree that a Maltese academic telling Papadopolous he had dirt on Hillary Clinton qualifies as evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia to sway the election.
Why wouldn't that information be used to get a FISA warrant on Papadopolous? If Papadopolous was the guy who started the entire investigation why did the FBI wait until January 27th to bring him in for questioning?
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
