Reply With Quote
Uh huh.
"The official story is fishy until you prove it's not"
He wasn't the guy traveling to Russia.
This isn't rocket science.
I certainly could be wrong as none of us have all the information, but since you don't have a different theory I don't consider your ankle biting to be very effective.
Uh huh.
"The official story is fishy until you prove it's not"
Roger Stone lied about his meeting with Assange—andthat's a lot more important than it may seem
Nunberg’s flight across the public stage, but he made no secret about the reason for his panic—
he was sure that Special Counsel Robert Mueller is out to get his friend and mentor Roger Stone.
While Nunberg started the evening claiming that Stone had done something wrong, eventually
he let slip that Stone “might have lied.”
And it seems clear that Roger Stone did lie.
Often.
About something that actually means more than it may seem.
Stone, an informal adviser to then-candidate Donald Trump, said he had learned from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that his organization had obtained emails that would torment senior Democrats such as John Podesta, then campaign chairman for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
The timing on this is interesting.This more than suggests that Stone’s contact with Assange was prompted by the Trump campaign.
The hack of Podesta’s emails itself began only in mid-March 2016.
Russian hackers were allegedly still breaking into the DNC’s network that April.
The suggestion, then, is that Stone may have known about the hacked information shortly after it was hacked —
which would raise questions about how rapidly the information was transferred from the hackers to WikiLeaks.
Which would make this particularly interesting to Mueller, and make Stone’s lies about the matter a direct cover-up of collusion within the Trump campaign.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
Roger Stone did lie about his meeting with Assange because Roger Stone never had a meeting with Assange.
Papadopolous is touted as the key figure who sparked the investigation. And Papadopolous was said to have been shown the stolen emails and offered help disseminating them. Why would the FBI not want to have Papadopolous under surveillance if he had contacts that were in possession of the stolen emails? Why would the FBI wait until after the election to ask him about the stolen emails he was told about?
It's all so fishy! I don't know how it's fishy. It just is.
Looks like Trash will be (as he always does, severely hurt the other parties in his "deals"), firing McCabe to deny him $100Ks in retirement benefits, only a few days before McCabe retires this Sunday.
Is Trash a vindictive enough, small enough prick to do it? you betcha
Trump can't fire McCabe as he isn't a political appointee. McCabe ed up and then lied to Horowitz about his up. him and his retirement benefits.
No more rabbit holes. What is your new conspiracy theory?
“I apologize,” Clapper wrote. “While my staff acknowledged the error to Senator Wyden’s staff soon after the hearing, I can now openly correct it because the existence of the metadata program has been declassified.”
My conspiracy theory is this is why he wasn't prosecuted.
What is your conspiracy theory, TSA?
These aren't rabbit holes these are questions that need to be answered to clear things up if you want to push that Papadopolous was the reason the investigation started.
Nope. It's celar enough to me.
If you're not happy, give us your new conspiracy theory. convince me of something else.
"I lied because I forgot about the Patriot Act"
It's not clear to you and that is why you can't answer the questions.
What is your conspiracy theory here, TSA?"I lied because I forgot about the Patriot Act"
Trump is planning to oust Sessions and crush the Mueller probe
President Donald Trump has hatched a new plan to oust Attorney General Jeff Sessions and crush Robert Mueller’s Russia probe — all while bypassing the need to ask the Senate to confirm a new attorney general.
Trump has discussed firing Sessions and replacing him with current Environmental Protection Agency chief Scott Pruitt.
Since Pruitt, unlike Sessions, has not recused himself from being involved in Russia-related matters, he would be completely free to shut down the probe.
“Also, as an agency head and former state attorney general, Pruitt would presumably have a good shot at passing a Senate confirmation hearing,”
He then trashed Sessions for not directing his own attorneys at the Department of Justice to investigate Obama themselves.
“Why not use Justice Department lawyers?” he asked. “DISGRACEFUL!”
Trump has not been shy about ripping into his own attorney general for not doing enough to investigate his political foes.
Trump called Sessions “beleaguered” and “weak” because he was not sufficiently investigating former Democratic rival Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/tru...e+Raw+Story%29
In his unlimited, convenient ignorance, malice, pathological egotism, Trash considers the DoJ to be his personal legal department with allegiance to Trash, not to the Cons ution.
I don't have a conspiracy theory it's just a case of a double standard being applied. You sound stupid trying to label everything a conspiracy theory.
Of course it's clear to me. I'm not going down any rabbit holes unless you have a competing conspiracy theory. Do you have a competing conspiracy theory?
Yes or no.
You say there is a double standard.
Why?
What causes the double standard?
Explain your double-standard-for-some-reason-but-totally-not-a-conspiracy-theory theory.
Ugh it's like 9/11 conspiracy nut
Dude is out there. Always claims victory on some intangible that no one is talking about.
Dude is out there. Always claims victory on some intangible that no one is talking about.
I agree. The people pushing the Trump/Russia collusion conspiracy theory are nuts.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions