Reply With Quote
At least 3.
Are DOJ and FBI investigations not serious in your opinion?Nunez
Serious investigations? ZERO.
At least 3.
which are?
tick tock
Mueller, Scneiderman (New York Attorney General), Senate Intel.
Clinton beats Trump with 4.
Clinton Foundation
Uranium One
Clinton emails
FEC Violations
Could probably even add in the DNC rigging of the primary
translation: they haven't told me what to say yet.
As I said, serious investigations: ZERO. Way to prove my point, Wile E Pizzaboy
"The most verbally belligerent president in history—who has abusive things to say about allies like Japan, South Korea, and Canada—cannot summon up any harsher adjective for a nerve attack on NATO soil than 'sad.'” -Atlantic
Does Trumps firing of Tillerson for criticizing Russia fit my theory :
Trump has been compromised in some way by the Russians?
wouldn't it be great for all of them to share the same prison?
Oh the DOJ and FBI are just conducting non-serious investigations, okay.
No it doesn't fit your theory dip .
He didn't fire Tillerson for criticizing Russia dip .
Tillerson was fired before he even made those comments dip .
Tillerson was fired because he wanted to keep the Iran deal alive dip .
you want to comment about the business probe?
Mueller is simply doing his job. Would you expect him not to investigate that?
what about trumps red line?
Bull . Tillerson supported the Iran deal for months.
He criticized Russia directly for the nerve gas attack on MONDAY, and was fired on TUESDAY.
That is what I wonder. Trump is so isolated and erratic, he may very well try to fire Mueller. We all () knew this day was coming, i.e. Mueller getting up in Trump's bidniz.
Now we get to see what happens when crazy doddering dolt gets cornered.
An investigation into Uranium One? A conflict of interest involving someone selling out their office for personal gain?
Is that a problem?
Tillerson was called Friday and then cut his Africa trip short and flew home Monday.Bull . Tillerson supported the Iran deal for months.
He criticized Russia directly for the nerve gas attack on MONDAY, and was fired on TUESDAY.
https://www.theatlantic.com/internat...meline/555464/
He was out before his comments on Russia.
You tell me.
Trump and Tillerson also disagreed publicly on the future of the nuclear deal with Iran. “We were not really thinking the same,” Trump said Tuesday about his differences with Tillerson over the agreement. “With Mike, Mike Pompeo, we have a very similar thought process.” Trump had called the agreement “the worst deal in history” and wanted the U.S. to withdraw from it. Tillerson said the deal was flawed, but that it did what it was supposed to: freeze Iran’s nuclear program. He had been working with U.S. allies who are part of the agreement to find a solution to the impasse caused by Trump’s position.Bull . Tillerson supported the Iran deal for months.
He criticized Russia directly for the nerve gas attack on MONDAY, and was fired on TUESDAY.
They were also divided on NATO: Trump dismissed it as irrelevant while, early in his presidency, appearing to condition U.S. support for its NATO allies on their defense expenditures. Tillerson tried to soothe the fears this caused within the alliance, which were being exacerbated by Russia’s increasingly muscular foreign policy.
On Qatar, Trump appeared to blame Doha for the impasse with its Gulf neighbors (and for funding terrorism), while Tillerson supported a negotiated settlement among America’s Arab allies—who include Qatar as well as the Saudi and UAE-led coalition pushing to isolate the country.
Tillerson cautioned the president against moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, which Trump did anyway; and he wanted the U.S. to stay in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement and the Paris climate accord, both of which Trump withdrew the U.S. from.
Looks like it may not have been criticism of Russia after all, but a desire not to have the Russia investigation in the news.Early Tuesday morning, the Washington Post reported that Roger Stone, the Republican dirty trickster and longtime Trump adviser, told an associate in the spring of 2016 that “he had learned from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that his organization had obtained emails that would torment senior Democrats such as John Podesta, then campaign chairman for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” This conversation took place “before it was publicly known that hackers had obtained the emails of Podesta and of the Democratic National Committee,” the story also noted.
As Reince Priebus, the former White House chief of staff, told Fox News’s Laura Ingraham, Trump pays a great deal of attention to how the daily news narrative evolves. After the Post’s scoop appeared, other news organizations leapt on it, and Stone’s name trended on Twitter. In all likelihood, the Post’s story, with its implication of possible collusion, would have dominated the day in cable news. But once the news of Tillerson’s firing broke, it slipped down the home pages, and Stone dropped off the trending list.
TSA can't even say that conflicts of interest are bad.
TSA: URANIUM ONE IS SCANDAL!!
Everyone who doesn't have their tongues down Trump's trousers: Is that because it is a conflict of interest, like Trump has?
TSA: LOOK A SQUIRREL!!!
Dishonest to the last.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 03-15-2018 at 05:01 PM. Reason: TSA not a moron, just a shill.
yeah but who cares?
its follow the money time!
WaPo was rehashing an already debunked story. Stone lied about his contacts with Wikileaks and Assange. Wikileaks told him to stop.Early Tuesday morning, the Washington Post reported that Roger Stone, the Republican dirty trickster and longtime Trump adviser, told an associate in the spring of 2016 that “he had learned from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that his organization had obtained emails that would torment senior Democrats such as John Podesta, then campaign chairman for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” This conversation took place “before it was publicly known that hackers had obtained the emails of Podesta and of the Democratic National Committee,” the story also noted.
As Reince Priebus, the former White House chief of staff, told Fox News’s Laura Ingraham, Trump pays a great deal of attention to how the daily news narrative evolves. After the Post’s scoop appeared, other news organizations leapt on it, and Stone’s name trended on Twitter. In all likelihood, the Post’s story, with its implication of possible collusion, would have dominated the day in cable news. But once the news of Tillerson’s firing broke, it slipped down the home pages, and Stone dropped off the trending list.
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Posting Permissions
