SMH. Full re .Too bad it wasn't.
McCabe testified there would be no FISA warrant without the dossier. Grassley/Graham said the application relied primarily on the dossier. Please explain how the FISA warrant wasn't based on the dossier.Too bad it wasn't.
Tell me again who founded Cambridge Analytica?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/cambridge...192148156.html
In another example, the CEO reportedly said the firm will “send some girls,” specifically Ukranian women, to a candidate’s house to seduce the individual, an act that Nix said “works very well.”
“I’m just giving you examples of what can be done and what, what has been done,” he told the reporter.
Other methods involved making the public believe inaccurate facts about a certain candidate.
“I mean, it sounds a dreadful thing to say, but these are things that don’t necessarily need to be true, as long as they’re believed,” he said.
These people are manipulating you, and bragging about how they have been doing so.
At some point, you may end up like the ex-neo-Nazi trying to get others out of that cult. I truly hope so. You seem intelligent enough for some self-reflection.
Dodge #1
McCabe testified there would be no FISA warrant without the dossier. Grassley/Graham said the application relied primarily on the dossier. Please explain how the FISA warrant wasn't based on the dossier.
Where's your proof that the Trump campaign was sharing data with Russia as to where to target their ads in swing states?
Tsa with the disingenuous prove-a-negative demands.
There were other things in the warrant application besides the dossier
Goal post shift of the day
Fox/Repugs/TSA and other assholes assume, and imply everywhere, that the Steele dossier is not a legit source of info for the FBI.
FBI gets leads from all types of sources.
Steele dossier is a legit source of info, incriminating info,
... even if Repugs and Dems paid for what is nothing but standard political oppo research.
McCabe testified there would be no FISA warrant without the dossier. Grassley/Graham said the application relied primarily on the dossier. Are you seriously trying to argue the FISA warrant was not based on the dossier?
There is a difference between dodging, and not giving a about your latest attempt to create a red herring to distract from the fact the President of the United states is acting like Putin's holster.
Why should I care about your attempts at obfuscation and red herrings? You will not get an answer until you tell me why this is more important to you than Trump's conflicts of interest and Trumps gross incompetence.
Quid, pro quo.
YOU claimed the FISA warrant was not based on the dossier. I can see why you don't want to discuss that ridiculous claim
TSA chooses to be ignorant of critical information that would cause his little conspiracy world to collapse.
The FBI said they already had the information that the dossier contained. Except for the pee thing.
The dossier was nothing more of a confirmation of what they already knew. The dossier was not what started it no matter what you say.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...m-mueller-rus/Trump is wrong to say the investigation into his campaign’s ties with Russia started with a dossier compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. Republican lawmakers have confirmed that George Papadopoulos, a former Trump campaign adviser who was told during the election that high-ranking Russian government officials in Moscow possessed "dirt" on Hillary Clinton in the form of "thousands of emails," triggered the probe
I never saw an actual quote myself. Maybe TSA can help us out.
the nunes memo says so. mccabe himself has said his quote was mischaracterized
Just another coincidence to you I'm sure. Russian disinformation campaigns get suddenly a lot more sophisticated about the time Bannon's company gets involved with the campaign.
Next thing you will be telling me that Tillerson being fired the day after calling Russia out was a coincidence.
So many coincidences. Seth Rich being mysteriously killed after his computer was involved in leaks, about the same time Steele said that the Russians were worried about getting caught for their meddling. A Russian intelligence general, just happened to fall on a bullet after the dossier with detailed insider knowledge came out.
The candidate, a total computer illiterate, just happened to call on Russia publicly for help hacking his opponents emails.
It piles up dude.
For the actual proof, that would take a subpoena. I wonder if there is anyone with subpoena powers who is looking into this...?
Guess tsa's next post?
I'll go with some variation of "prove they couldn't get the warrant without the dossier"
Quite the contrary, I would be happy to discuss my answer, but I don't really have any patience where you are concerned these days.YOU claimed the FISA warrant was not based on the dossier. I can see why you don't want to discuss that ridiculous claim
You will not get an answer until you tell me why this is more important to you than Trump's conflicts of interest and Trumps gross incompetence, because I am genuinely curious as to what motivates someone to work so hard at being dishonest, and overlook so much corruption.
Quid, pro quo.
speaking of Seth Rich check out this crazy
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...=.ee1f75d64f85
CIA mouthpiece WaPo good now
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote