They're both at fault but I think most of the blame should go to Kawhi's soft, -made ass, tbh.
Kawhi
PATFO
The facts
- Kawhi was misdaganosed medically by incompetent spurs doctors that forced him to play endangering his livelihood
- Kawhi is now cleared to play but refuses to play
The rumors
- Kawhi is unhappy with the Patty and Gasol Extension
- Kawhi is unhappy with the lack of recognition
They're both at fault but I think most of the blame should go to Kawhi's soft, -made ass, tbh.
I'm on the Spurs' side.
Ugh I hate the front office RN, but kawhi is being soft and over conservative imho. This isn't an acl or anything it's just a sore quad.
Kawhi playing chess while PATFO playing checkers.
How in any way are the Spurs to blame? He was cleared to play like 25 times and won't. Pop babies his players injuries. Tim played 20 years here and never had one issue with anyone over anything like this. KL is soft. Soft as . Bottom line..
I don't understand why people feel like you have to pick a side.
The Spurs are frustrated. Kawhi is frustrated. The fans are frustrated.
The situation is frustrating.
Kawhi's uncle, tbh.
exactly, wishing that Kawhi came out of the spurs without being sure what's happening does not make sense
The spurs went from a 60 win team to under 50. That's how good kawhi was.
Lol at SAgirl having an orgasm about all this just because oceanhead can now play some minutes without kawhi.
The Spurs suck without kawhi is a fact. Universehead fangirl![]()
Spurs don’t suck without Kawhi. If the Spurs suck, that means you have to think that: CLE, PHI, IND, WAS, MIA, MIL, OKC, NO, MIN, UTA, DEN & LAC really suck because they all have the same or WORSE records than San Antonio without Kawhi all year.
Many of those teams, like OKC, have had their superstars healthy all year too.
Anyteam that undergoes a 20+ win defferential because theyir star sat out suck. I dont know know what your def of suckage is but this season alone proved that last couple years the spurs have been super depedant on Kawhi.
So yeah. They do suck otherwise theyd at least maintain 50.
Just figured the fact they clinched their 21 straight winning season would stand out more than Kyle being a footnote.
Clearly the team is not a sub .500 team at this point. That is what is relevant here.
Now obviously the team wants him back and when healthy he's a legit MVP... that is not in dispute.
I am in no one's side really. But no matter where Kawhi plays next season (or Kyle for that matter) I will still be a Spurs fan. So I guess I am with the Spurs.
Spurs can be great with Kawhi, but still being just as good or better than all the teams I listed (mostly with super stars fully healthy too) clearly shows they don’t suck. At all.
They aren’t championship material but that is a wide gulf from “suck”.
So you are basically saying there are only 3-4 teams in the nba that don’t suck then. Listen to yourself.
Any team is going to be dependent on a top 5 talent.
Remove James, Harden, or Westbrook from their teams and see how they would look.
Clinching a winning season is irrelevant. They want from a 60 win team to a 40 is what is relevant.
In short, this team has 40 win players and the only difference last year and the year befpre that is kawhi.
The spurs are awful. The worse they have been in 25 years.
BS. Westbrook isnt leading his team to 60 is he?
The myth that poop can carry anyteam to 50 is now busted. And we can finally rest the idea that the spurs actually have a decent rooster and that kawhi is surrounded by a decent rooster. He is not.
Whatever it is, the damage is done. Both Kawhi and Spurs need a fresh start..Kawhi to LA for a fresh start and Spurs to Seatle.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)