Reply With Quote
So what are you afraid the government will do to make you take up arms against it?No I was just laughing at your hypothesis just like the general consensus is ITT
If it kills you, how is it not effective?
So what are you afraid the government will do to make you take up arms against it?No I was just laughing at your hypothesis just like the general consensus is ITT
The same way making a big drug bust hasn't been effective in stopping drugs.
Yes, actually, it is a legal question.
Legal issues require definitions.
Cons utional issues require definitions.
Hand-waving doesn't really cut it in court, much to the chagrin of creationists, and people who believe in the voter fraud myth.
Define "properly operating"? Who determines what is properly operating and what isn't?
Define "citizen soldier".
But you're dead. The strategy was to kill you.
I would argue we already have one. They enrich themselves and get elected, not always in that order.
This ruling class funds Super Pacs to the tune of billions of dollars, and they even have their own propaganda arms, such as Fox "news" and so forth. The richest 1% have been very effective at convincing the dumbest 20% that rich people give a about them.
Which president has said that he wanted to revoke the broadcast licenses of outlets he didn't agree with?
Which president is blocking a business merger of a company he didn't agree with?
We do, it's called the deep state. Trump is currently fighting it with all its cords and tethers.
Do you think you will be joining others in a well regulated militia?Providing historical example of a Gov't going against the will of the people
Right now, I'm not afraid the US gov't is going to do anything. But, I like to keep my options open.
If so, I suggest communication devices other than cell phones. Let's think ahead here.
You got canned food stored somewhere? Hold out, communicate, form sort of movement. Somebody is really gonna need artillery I'm thinking. Maybe you just capture that. There will be those who turn against the government.
Some of you guys have got to be getting a bit of a woody by now...
The problem is you don't think big picture tbh. They were effective at killing me is equivalent to street dealer drug bust(not even a big drug bust). And apparently they utilized a nuke to do it. Which moved even more people against the tyrannical government. Not just in the country but now they've motivated other countries to get involved because these people are lunatics and an environmental risk. I guess that's what you consider "effective".
What future possibility are you thinking could happen?
Well if the civilian militia had it's own nukes, they could cold war the government into a stalemate
Big picture
Bwahaaaaa hahaha.
Ok, so they just drop a conventional bomb on you and kill you.
Effective?
The usualNo I was just laughing at your hypothesis just like the general consensus is ITT
What's lower/next after conventional bomb
Blake has officially lost all his marbles
Chris still terrified to post a thought of his own
Blake: hurr durr that's re ed
Blake: hurr durr that's rich
Blake: hurr durr lol (insert random 1-3 words here)
95% of Blake's posts
You are worried, yet you support them taking away your means to fight? Mind boggling...
*RandomGuy logs out
Young Joe B
Randomguy isn't focused on me!
Deal with it. You aren't the center of my world.
Still waiting on that proof that Donald is a sexual predator
Deal with it. You aren't the center of my world.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
