Reply With Quote
Nope just put more restrictions on. Just like post said. Sorry you had emotional meltdown and did not read. Typical ducks doing typical emotional outlash
Stephen Paddock couldn't have killed all those people in Vegas from 400 yards away with a handgun.
Nope just put more restrictions on. Just like post said. Sorry you had emotional meltdown and did not read. Typical ducks doing typical emotional outlash
You just got triggered.... meltdown city baby!!!!!
The idiots flooding the streets said "I can have my musket". So let's ban cell phones and you can have your rotary dial phone.
Yeah, ducks comments that supports what I've been saying "triggered" me.
While were at ban cars and go back to horse and buggy. We are trying to save lives.
They didn't march the streets over Paddock. They marched it over 17 children getting killed which could easily happen with handguns. The powers at be know how to use them as a weapon for their agenda.
Really melting down and not having rational debate. Typical. Keep melting down your stuff is halrious to read... not even responding on topic. Lololol mmmmmeeeeellllttttttt doooooowwwwwwnnnnnnnnThey didn't march the streets over Paddock. They marched it over 17 children getting killed which could easily happen with handguns. The powers at be know how to use them as a weapon for their agenda.
Pwned
They didn't march the streets over Paddock. They marched it over 17 children getting killed which could easily happen with handguns. The powers at be know how to use them as a weapon for their agenda.
"the powers at be"
The NRA controls every branch of government at this point.
Tell me, do handguns make the same wounds as AR-15 type weapons?
You clowns dont know the first thing about the NRA.
"OMG the NRA is liek, this all-powerful shadowy organization because the gun companies have more money than any other en y obviously and they liek literally buy all the politicians to make them do their bidding!! They literally want no gun restrictions at all! They want to arm babies with ar15's right out of the womb im serrrious!!
It's irrelevant that there minor distinctions between handguns and AR-15s. Once they are removed from the playing field then they'll fear monger over another gun. This isn't a position based on logic it's based on a combination of fear mongering and a selfish perspective. Which will be just as easily applied to handguns.
The NRA controls every branch of government at this point.
Tell me, do handguns make the same wounds as AR-15 type weapons?
OK, tell us all about the NRA.
Which proposed gun regulation laws are they currently endorsing?
It's quite relevant. You can't just avoid talking about bullet wounds because you don't wanna.
Do handguns make the same wounds as AR-15 type weapons?
Yes, because this protest is happening because the size of the bullet wounds.
It's completely irrelevant.
Of course it's relevant. You're saying handguns are the same as AR15s for all practical purposes. That's your argument.
Do handguns make the same wounds as AR-15 type weapons?
Yes or no.
Nope, that's not my argument. My argument is the difference isn't significant enough for the idiots to stop marching for the disarming of Americans if the AR-15 was banned.
Man youve lost it. Sad really
Lots of them, there are already tons of them on the books. The best example is they constantly advocate for penalties for those who use guns while committing crimes, those who obtain them illegally, those who attemp to make straw purchses (buying a gun legally for someone who is prohibited from obtaining one legally) and those who lie on the backgrpund check forms/attempt to buy them when they are prohibited from doing so. These measures would prevent countless criminals from obtaining firearms or would at least put authorities on notice. The irony is that of the tens of thousands who were reported in recent years for these things, only something like 14 were actually prosecuted, reason beong the Holder dept of justice saw prosecuting those as 'racist' since they tended to be disproportionately from a certain race, and this went against the obama/holder policy of being soft on crime 'because racist'. Ironically such measures would have also likely prevented Cruz from obtaining any guns or at least would have had him prosecuted for prior offenses instead of being simply let go some 39 times ans this would have never even happened
Oh, your argument is they are not significantly different.
OK, let's discuss how they are not significantly different.
Are wounds caused by AR15 type weapons significantly different from those caused by handguns?
Yes or no.
Significant enough
I didn't ask which existing regulations they were advocating.
Which proposed gun regulation laws are they currently endorsing?
Are wounds caused by AR15 type weapons significantly different from those caused by handguns?
Yes or no.
Can you easily kill a lot of people with handguns? yes.
Like 17 kids? Yes
Well then we can continue to use them as a weapon for our agenda.
Meanwhile the media refuses to stop covering mass murders because they want ratings. Ok.
Ah, now muh media is to blame.
Are wounds caused by AR15 type weapons significantly different from those caused by handguns?
Yes or no.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions