Reply With Quote
And then what?
I predict Horowitz is going to investigate the application for the FISA warrant on Carter Page and the FBI/DOJ relationship with Christopher Steele.
And then what?
Some goalpost moving here and there. Rinse/repeat
If laws were broken he'll recommend actions be taken by the DOJ.
What laws do you think were broken?
I don't have access to what Horowitz has so I'm fine with letting him and his 500 employees figure out what laws were broken. I'll be sure to keep you updated on their findings
Do you think laws were broken?I don't have access to what Horowitz has so I'm fine with letting him and his 500 employees figure out what laws were broken. I'll be sure to keep you updated on their findings
Yes or no.
Yes.
Don't know and am willing to let Horowitz and his team sort that out
Do you think laws were broken?
Yes or no.
Yes.
Don't know and am willing to let Horowitz and his team sort that out
SOMEONE BROKE SOME LAW SOMEWHERE AND I AM PREDICTING SOMEONE WILL BE PROSECUTED FOR SOMETHING BUT IT'S A BIG SECRET CAN'T TELL YOU REMEMBER REMEMBER CLINTON EATS BABIES
Sad, dude. #pizzagate broke you.
how can you know that a law was broken if you don't know what law was broken? or at least a description of the criminal conduct
the only way that works is if you are entirely speculating. which you're free to do. but won't carry much weight in a discussion.
Definitely not enough to declare it an unraveling over and over.
Do you think laws were broken?
SOMEONE BROKE SOME LAW SOMEWHERE AND I AM PREDICTING SOMEONE WILL BE PROSECUTED FOR SOMETHING BUT IT'S A BIG SECRET CAN'T TELL YOU REMEMBER REMEMBER CLINTON EATS BABIES
Sad, dude. #pizzagate broke you.
Yes or no.
ITS UNRAVELING
why do you say that?
BECAUSE I THINK SOMEBODY MAY HAVE DONE SOMETHING WRONG
who and what?
NO CLUE, BUT SOMEBODY... SOMETHING
I never said I knew a law was broken.
Do you think laws were broken?
Yes or no.
I don't know, tbh. I'd have to know the laws that are applicable here.
What makes you think laws were broken?
What laws do you think apply here?
ok. but you think a law was broken. what, specifically, has led you to think that a law was broken? what has informed your thought process?
at this point, i have no basis to think a law was broken (or at least a significant enough one to have any sort of ramification)
FBI reluctance to hand over requested do ents.
To a partisan committee?
What laws do you think apply here?
Grassley has oversight, they are required to produce the do ents.
What will Grassley do that the IG won't?
You're on two different tracks here.
No one claimed Grassley was going to do anything that the IG would not do. I don't know what track you are on.
The AG and members of congress that have reviewed the evidence think a law was broken and the IG has agreed to investigate. What are you basing your thoughts of no law being broken on?
the lack of impartiality of those parties is kinda a big deal though
i'm not ruling out the possibility of a law having been broken. i just haven't been made aware of any facts that would lead me to affirmatively believe that there were laws broken.
that whole burden of proof thing
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
