CNN: Jeff Sessions say second special counsel

[Reck]

Tyranny is just a an additional Y from being tranny.

A an. What's the matter tubby, those fat ass burger fingers getting in the way?

[Pavlov]

"Expert" is just one take away from having one take.

[TSA]

Just like there never was with Mueller.

Too bad some of Mueller's team were removed for bias

[TSA]

thread

[Pavlov]

Too bad some of Mueller's team were removed for bias

mean texts

[Pavlov]

thread

Dude Seesions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel.

[Reck]

thread

There is no such thing as a secret prosecutor.

[TSA]

Dude Seesions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel.

You're flustered and not making sense, try again.

[djohn2oo8]

There is no such thing as a secret prosecutor.

lordy! Pizza sex shops and now secret prosecutors.

[Pavlov]

You're flustered and not making sense, try again.

You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.

[djohn2oo8]

You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.

[Spurtacular]

Sure. And after reading Sessions response it isn't needed as he already has a team of Federal prosecutors working in cooperation with the Inspector General. You still haven't read the actual letter from Sessions have you?

Internal review is just code for, "it's getting buried." The optics is not good for Sessions. Trump needs to get rid of his sorry ass. He's dead weight.

[TSA]

You're flustered and can't comprehend a simple sentence. Try again.

No your sentence makes no sense. Try again. What are you trying to say?

[TSA]

Internal review is just code for, "it's getting buried." The optics is not good for Sessions. Trump needs to get rid of his sorry ass. He's dead weight.

You're clueless.

[Pavlov]

No your sentence makes no sense. Try again. What are you trying to say?

Everyone else who read it gets it. You're failing. Try again.

[TSA]

Everyone else who read it gets it. You're failing. Try again.

"Sessions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel"

that doesn't make sense. Can you clarify what you are trying to say?

[Pavlov]

"Sessions asked to determine whether there should be a second Special Counsel determines there should not be a second Special Counsel"

that doesn't make sense. Can you clarify what you are trying to say?

You're so flustered you can't even correctly quote me.

Try quoting me again. Do it correctly this time.

[Reck]

You're clueless.

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

[Spurtacular]

You're clueless.

I'm a realist. Sessions is incompetent at best; part of the corruption at worst. I'll argue against the Democrats and their BS all day long; but I ain't carrying water for sycophants like Sessions.

[Spurtacular]

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

I always make sense, tranny. You're only saying I am in this case cos it goes in favor of what you've been programmed for.

[Pavlov]

I'm a realist. Sessions is incompetent at best; part of the corruption at worst. I'll argue against the Democrats and their BS all day long; but I ain't carrying water for sycophants like Sessions.

For whom is Sessions a sycophant?

[TSA]

Actually for once, Spurtacular is making sense and for the most part of that post, I agree with him.

Sorry you're not able to see it for what it is. Not everything has an angle and not everything has to have a conspiracy behind it.

OIG reports don’t get buried. You’re as clueless as Spurt.

[Reck]

I always make sense, tranny. You're only saying I am in this case cos it goes in favor of what you've been programmed for.

I dont see how him getting fired goes well for my and really the American interest really.

In firing Sessions, he can appoint a stooge that will do his bidding and fire Mueller. But that's an entirely different problem for Trump if he does.

That's the part of your post I dont agree with.

[TSA]

You're so flustered you can't even correctly quote me.

Try quoting me again. Do it correctly this time.

I dropped the dude and corrected your spelling of Sessions. If you don’t want to clarify your word salad just say so but I was genuinely curious what you were trying to say.

[Chris]

CNN

dodgerjohn

dabom

spurraider21

RandomGay

Reck

Pavlov