Certainly doesn't look necessary at this time.
Because he would have, you know, appointed one.
Why does your team want one so badly?
Goalpost move. That wasn’t djohns claim.
Certainly doesn't look necessary at this time.
Because he would have, you know, appointed one.
Why does your team want one so badly?
Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?
that goalpost move holy
Did they rescind their request?
No, they did not.
He looked into the possibility at their request for over a month.
End result: no Special Counsel.
This is why I call you dishonest Pavlov. You are moving the goalposts for djohn and not even attempting to refute his actual claim.
No 2nd special counsel.
Sure looks like one isn't needed at this time since Sessions did not appoint one.
What other conclusion is there to be drawn?
Sooper Sekrit conspiracy!
Dodge #1
Had Sessions appointed a Special Counsel at the request of the GOP would the left cry foul yes or no?
Bam. No 2nd special counsel.
Sorry, you have questions pending above.
If you're saying Sessions is controlled by the possible reaction of "the left," you need to take a deep breath and think about that.
lol
Did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?
Your question is based on a goalpost move.
By not appointing one?
Yes.
He was just stealthy about it.
Like you say he is.
Did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?
It makes more sense that he is dangling the remote possibility of still appointing a Special Counsel out of fear of reaction from the right, including Dennison.
There's your answer.
In his letter did Sessions say a 2nd Special Counsel was not needed yes or no?
Didn't have to.
There is no 2nd Special Counsel. If one was needed, he would appoint one.
You proved this yourself.
TSA
Can’t get a straight answer out of either of you. Two shook peas in a pod![]()
You can't even say there is no 2nd Special Counsel.
shook
No Special Counsel. Facts.![]()
He appointed Susan Rice.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)