Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[TSA]

BTW, Mueller's office has said Van Der Zwann has information that is not known to the public. Lordy!

BREAKING: THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW SOME OF THE INFORMATION THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAS GATHERED

[TSA]

Yet you said Manafort had nothing to do with collusion? Lordy!

Manafort's indictment says NOTHING about collusion during the election. Are you being obtuse or are you just a flustered re ?

[djohn2oo8]

BREAKING: THE PUBLIC DOES NOT KNOW SOME OF THE INFORMATION THE SPECIAL COUNSEL HAS GATHERED

So why do you claim to know it has nothing to do with the election? Lordy!

[djohn2oo8]

Manafort's indictment says NOTHING about collusion during the election. Are you being obtuse or are you just a flustered re ?

And in Rosenstein's memo, there are redacted charges and allegations there that are still classified.

[djohn2oo8]

Let the anger out TSA.

[TSA]

djohn attempting to show Trump/Russia election collusion

[djohn2oo8]

Every single TSA conspiracy attempt

[spurraider21]

TSA with the all caps, large font, and emoji posts. and he's the one who likes to point out "nervous laughter"

[Pavlov]

TSA with the all caps, large font, and emoji posts. and he's the one who likes to point out "nervous laughter"

Anything to keep from talking about the Roger Stone investigation.

[Chris]

The meltdown is real. Sorry your "nothing to do with the election" theory is dead and gone.

van der Zwaan had nothing to do with the election.


The van der Zwaan case did not involve Mueller's central mission of examining potential help for Russian election meddling in 2016. Instead, it grew out of the investigation of Gates and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, over work they did in Ukraine more than a decade ago.

My "nothing to do with the election" theory is still 100% correct.

Djohn

[djohn2oo8]

Anything to keep from talking about the Roger Stone investigation.

The whole guccifer 2.0 fail hit too close to home for him.

[djohn2oo8]

Djohn

Chris. Define Mccarthyism.

[spurraider21]

Chris. Define Mccarthyism.

Whatever Mueller is doing.

-Chris

[TSA]

TSA with the all caps, large font, and emoji posts. and he's the one who likes to point out "nervous laughter"

[djohn2oo8]

Whatever Mueller is doing.

-Chris

[djohn2oo8]

Damn you rattled son.

[TSA]

Anything to keep from talking about the Roger Stone investigation.

What do you want to talk about? Stone never meeting with Assange? Stone never leaving the country in 2016? Wikileaks telling Stone to stop the false claims of association?

[Chris]

Time to shut her down.

[djohn2oo8]

Time to shut her down.

Chris. Define McCarthyism.

[djohn2oo8]

What do you want to talk about? Stone never meeting with Assange? Stone never leaving the country in 2016? Wikileaks telling Stone to stop the false claims of association?

Stone said in an email that he dined with him.

[spurraider21]

lol just trying to find every opportunity to use the word collusion

[djohn2oo8]

BTW, TSA, why are you believing Wikileaks?

[Chris]

chirp chirp

[TSA]

Stone said in an email that he dined with him.

Assange shut Stone down. Wikileaks shut Stone down. Stone shut Stone down.

"Stone served as an adviser on President Donald Trump's presidential campaign, and according to The WSJ report, Stone said in an email on August 4, 2016, that he had "dined with Julian Assange last night."
However, Stone has denied ever meeting Assange.
In a text exchange on Friday before the WSJ report, Stone said he "never met or spoke with Assange ever," and Stone told The Journal the contents of the email were "said in jest."

Stone also noted that his passport showed that he did not leave the country in 2016."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/02/polit...sel/index.html

[spurraider21]

Time to shut her down.

Gregg Jarrett

Manafort’s interpretation of the regulations and the language and effect of the Appointment Order is unsound.

1. In arguing that his charged conduct falls outside of the Appointment Order, Manafortassumes that the Order contains the full and complete “factual statement” provided to the SpecialCounsel upon his appointment.

Doc. 235 at 17 (“The ‘[o]riginal jurisdiction’ conveyed in theAppointment Order includes language that resembles a ‘specific factual statement of the matter tobe investigated.’”) (quoting 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a)).

But nothing in the regulations requires that the“specific factual statement” be provided publicly, or in the order appointing the Special Counsel.Cf. Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, No. 15-1439, 2018 WL 1384564,at *3 (S. Ct. Mar. 20, 2018) (“The [regulation] says what it says—or perhaps better put here, doesnot say what it does not say.”). And the Acting Attorney General has explained that he transmitted the facts to the Special Counsel non-publicly here. Rosenstein Testimony at 29-30; August 2 Scope

https://www.do entcloud.org/do e...to-motion.html