You're pissy over nothing.
Period.
Deal with it.
so you could never support your theory. Got it.
You're pissy over nothing.
Period.
Deal with it.
Putin the evil mastermind pulling all the strings![]()
That's not an indictment concerning Trump/Russia election collusion dummy, that's an indictment concerning lobbying work from 2012 in Ukraine dummy.
RandomGuy and his wonkette infatuation
It's Pavjecting again. I don't get pissy over an online message board.
Can you support the botched robbery theory?
Asked, and answered twice. You will not get another, pizzaboichik.![]()
I asked you if you can support your theory. You cannot.
Didn't say it was.
TSA and his strawman infatuation.
(rolls out of chair laughing)
Sure you don't.... (gasp)
(wipes eyes)
Sure....
you're the one whining about my calling out your dodging questions.
TSA: I ONLY DODGE MOST OF YOUR QUESTIONS!
Was the former marine who tried to kill the Seth Rich investigator really a Russian GRU agent?
http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/20/se...ator-attacked/
Van der Zwaan isn’t the biggest criminal in the Trump-Russia probe, by any means. He is a young lawyer who, when faced with the decision between doing law correctly and doing dirty for Paul Manafort and Rick Gates and their Russian spy buddy and then lying to authorities and destroying evidence, chose the latter. But he is important in that, light sentence notwithstanding, he’s obviously already helped with the investigation to the point that he’s been a big help in delivering bigger fish to Mueller.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/632166/today-wa...3DJpAHje6OV.99
Then why did you post it? Did you need to hit your hourly wonkette quota to get your shill pay?
No idea. Russian intelligence turns people all the time, and hires people who don't know that they are acting on their behest.
"Conspiracy nut attacks other conspiracy nut"
The van der Zwaan case did not involve Mueller's central mission of examining potential help for Russian election meddling in 2016. Instead, it grew out of the investigation of Gates and former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort over work they did in Ukraine more than a decade ago.
Prosecuting van der Zwaan was more likely intended to send a message that Mueller's team would move aggressively against anyone who tried to obstruct their investigation rather than to enlist van der Zwaan's help. The terms of his plea do not require him to cooperate with prosecutors.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...-probe-n862186
RandomGuy and his wonkette infatuation
I like Wonkette. They say " " a lot.
Like "I can't believe there are ing stupid people who think Trump didn't collude with Russia". or " ing stupid people shill for Trump."
whining
It's Pavjecting again
Yeah, this guy looks like a dumb footnote at this point.
Gates and Papadopoulos are much more valuable for the actual investigation.
Well they sure as don't know what the they are ing talking about concerning ing van der Zwaan. The ing terms of his ing plea deal do not ing require him to ing cooperate with the ing prosecutors.
Of course you were whining.
You dodge questions all the time.
Deal with it.
Papadopoulos is worthless. Gates and Manafort are valuable in bringing down Podesta and Weber.
Here's where you start dodging questions again.
What is your Podesta/Weber conspiracy theory?
They'll be indicted for crimes similar to Manafort/Gates.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)