Reply With Quote
And you got y after that and stupidly accepted $2000 worth of bets from me. Biatch.Well you are posting from another account because one of my theories was a fact. Biatch.
Never said I had evidence dummy, hence the word "could".
Shady lobbying work outside of Ukraine.
And you got y after that and stupidly accepted $2000 worth of bets from me. Biatch.Well you are posting from another account because one of my theories was a fact. Biatch.
Walk me through how Podesta would need to launder money the way Manafort and Gates are accused of doing.
It's your conspiracy theory.
Outside of Ukraine?Shady lobbying work outside of Ukraine.
Where?
Typical feelings over facts Lib
Another baseless Chris claim.Typical feelings over facts Lib
Another "I'm completely lost here and have no idea what's going on" post from ReckAnother baseless Chris claim.
Define Mccarthyism.Another "I'm completely lost here and have no idea what's going on" post from Reck
My favorite tennis player is Porton Becker.Another "I'm completely lost here and have no idea what's going on" post from Reck
Reck's hive mind buddies coming to the rescue!
Chris using a search engine is like him trying to wipe his own ass. He can't do neither.
Djohn admitting he is SOL without a search engine! Lawdy!
Anybody want to tell Chris that's what google is?Djohn admitting he is SOL without a search engine! Lawdy!
Google and Kyle Griffin is the extent of your wisdom.
Chuck Woolery is the extent of yoursGoogle and Kyle Griffin is the extent of your wisdom.
Show us on the doll where Chuck touched you.
I haven't posted a Woolery tweet in a long time
Mueller told Trump’s attorneys the president remains under investigation but is not currently a criminal targetAnd you got y after that and stupidly accepted $2000 worth of bets from me. Biatch.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...mpression=true
from that piece, btw
Prosecutors view someone as a subject when that person has engaged in conduct that is under investigation but there is not sufficient evidence to bring charges.
The special counsel also told Trump’s lawyers that he is preparing a report about the president’s actions while in office and potential obstruction of justice, according to two people with knowledge of the conversations.
Mueller reiterated the need to interview Trump — both to understand whether he had any corrupt intent to thwart the Russia investigation and to complete this portion of his probe, the people said.Other advisers, however, noted that subjects of investigations can easily become indicted targets — and expressed concern that the special prosecutor was baiting Trump into an interview that could put the president in legal peril.Under Justice Department guidelines, a subject of an investigation is a person whose conduct falls within the scope of a grand jury’s investigation. A target is a person for which there is substantial evidence linking him or her to a crime.A subject could become a target with his or her own testimony, legal experts warn.
Anonymous sources good now.Mueller told Trump’s attorneys the president remains under investigation but is not currently a criminal target
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ampht...mpression=true
Who and why is Mueller looking at for obstruction of justice?
That in itself makes Trump a target.
Quotes an article explaining the difference between a subject and a target, immediately proves he doesn’t know the difference between a subject and a target.Anonymous sources good now.
Who and why is Mueller looking at for obstruction of justice?
That in itself makes Trump a target.
Mueller hitting these s with the head fake.Anonymous sources good now.
Who and why is Mueller looking at for obstruction of justice?
That in itself makes Trump a target.
No, I'm quoting you and how wrong you are.Quotes an article explaining the difference between a subject and a target, immediately proves he doesn’t know the difference between a subject and a target.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions