Reply With Quote
The goalpost remains. Your definition of proof encompasses anything that has been published.Goal post...moved.
Chris now doesn't like the proof offered, so requires something else, but won't say what that is.
Dishonest sophist to the last.
Allegations are not proof. Prove it.
The goalpost remains. Your definition of proof encompasses anything that has been published.Goal post...moved.
Chris now doesn't like the proof offered, so requires something else, but won't say what that is.
Dishonest sophist to the last.
What proof do you require Chris? Feel free to chalk that outline.
I need proof that Donald Trump is a sexual predator. You have provided little more than hearsay.What proof do you require Chris? Feel free to chalk that outline.
"hearsay" is when Person A is talking about something they heard person B say about something. Sorry more fail.
This is direct witness and victim testimony, and some of them are willing to testify under oath at their legal proceedings, in addition to providing public statements, by definition NOT hearsay, councilor.
Witness testimony to something that happened directly to them is the definition of proof.
I have, therefore, proven Donald Trump is a sexual predator, pretty much by your own definition. Donald Trump behaved in a "typically abusive" manner.
You can't weasel out of the lawsuit threats, and the actual lawsuits.
Hard to claim those lawsuits never happened, even for your lying ass, Chris.
You have proven jack tool
Go back to rooting for Billy inserting cigars into womens rectums
Maybe we can prove that Vladimir Putin is a murderous thug, which you have admitted. Why no criticism of dear precious Vlad?
Nope. Those are all allegations until you prove them in a court of law or the defendant comes clean. Neither of which have happened. You can butter it up as much as you want but that ain't cooked. Send it back to the kitchen and get your shinebox while you're there.
i'll go ahead and give a preemptive *ding* to myself
based on this burden that you've defined, you have no proof of any clinton crimes, right?
Clinton is currently being investigated sans "HQ Special".
right. but nothing has been proven in the court of law, and clinton hasn't "come clean."
lol "hearsay"
Ok, did you have somewhere you were going with this?
nope, that's it
That's what I figured Pleb.
Hey Chris, what is a "Pleb"?That's what I figured Pleb.
If you don't know what a Pleb is then you are probably a Pleb.
Yeah, but what is your definition, Chris?
You asked for proof, we have corroberrating statements from almost two dozen women, and the man's direct admission ON TAPE.
You don't think a direct personal admission is "proof", white Chris?
Plebs are needed.
He admitted it on the bus with Billy Bush. That's not hearsay.
Locker room talk doesn't mean you are a sexual predator. Next!
It means Trump is.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions