Reply With Quote
When did the DNC pay Steele?
Be specific.
DNC paying Christopher Steele for opposition research. If you think Don Jr arranging a meeting with a Russian for opposition research reaches collusion than surely the DNC paying a Brit for it must reach that same level of collusion if not more.
Collusion or not collusion?
When did the DNC pay Steele?
Be specific.
April 2016-October 2016 through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS.
Explain how paying a foreigner for opposition research is not collusion but meeting a foreigner and not receiving opposition research is collusion.
Your timeline is off.
Did the person writing the checks even know Steele was employed?
it's never been about what crime djt has or hasn't commited; it's about obama/hrc not being deemed dictator for life. the loons on the left run on pure hatred masked with legality to make their stance look redeemable.
Timeline is fine.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.12cb88b2a641
at trying to use ignorance of payments as a defense. You are so disingenuous it’s sad.
You planted your flag with the Dems and their narrative, you chose to stand on that hill with djohn, you’ll join him on the tree of woe.
Sorry, it's off. It's a fundamental mistake.
Get back to me when you actually know when Steele was paid.
I'll wait.
It’s irrelevant. The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?
You’ll continue to try and squirm out of answering by asking more questions and in doing so will show the forum your white flag.
It's indicative of your understanding of the situation.
So far you're completely wrong. Stupidly wrong. Fatally wrong.
rosenstein's wife, is a top obama/clinton lawyer
her husband, rosenstein, is a top trump lawyer.
you think that somehow makes rod rosenstein compromised... but maybe his wife was compromised and working for republicans under pressure from her republican husband...
Squirm #1
The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?
were the brits trying to influence the US election in a state-sanctioned manner, and did they commit crimes in furtherance of that cause?
Squirm #1
The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?
They paid a law firm.
Squirm #1
The DNC/Clinton campaign paid a foreigner to conduct opposition research. Is that collusion yes or no?
Fix your timeline. It's wrong.
Steele is a "crown prosecutor"
No.
Why is this so difficult for you?
Irrelevant. We are discussing collusion from the US campaigns.
If Don Jr meeting with a foreigner for to get opposition research is collusion than the DNC paying a foreigner for opposition research is collusion.
Yeah, it's relevant.
Why do you want to ignore facts?
But meeting with a foreigner for opposition research and not getting it is collusion?
it's not irrelevant.
otherwise, did the RNC collude with trump to get him elected over hillary?
did george soros collude with hillary to help her in the election?
did trump collude with trump jr?
collusion is only relevant here because of the crimes committed by a foreign power
edit: im going to go ahead and correct/clarify myself that there would have to be underlying illegal behavior for it to be considered collusion
Please explain how it’s relevant. I’m looking forward to how you will try and distance the DNC/Clinton campaign from Christopher Steele.
Not in and of itself, no. Who has said it is?But meeting with a foreigner for opposition research and not getting it is collusion?
The distance is already there. That's how they work. That's how it's different.
They're not stupid. Stupid is having your son, son-in-law and campaign manager meet with Russians in an attempt to get dirt on Clinton.
What crime did Veselnitskaya commit when she met with Don Jr?
see edits above
So it’s not collusion if you hide the payments to foreigners gathering opposition research?
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Posting Permissions