Reply With Quote
The part where none of it had to do with a leak from Mueller’s investigation.
You didn't answer the question, but since you want to make it personal, I'll ask again -- do you randomly accuse people of racism at social gatherings after lying about what they said?
Tell me how that's a blast.
The part where none of it had to do with a leak from Mueller’s investigation.
You must be really lonely and bored to keep pushing this.
I accepted your explanation, although anything having to do with Cohen could be out of his team's control now that it's a SDNY criminal investigation.
Anything else you don't understand?
You must really be shook to go the personal route with multiple posters today.
It's not unexpected. You do this a lot.
The article you quoted specifically said Mueller’s investigation, did you not read it?
Yes, Mueller turned over all manner of Cohen evidence to SDNY.
Anything else you don't understand?
I mean you don't believe it anyway, so what?
You semen shielded for an obvious joke. You either lack a sense of humor or are lonely and bored, or both.
I’m sure spurraider21 will stop by and thank you for clearing his name and letting everyone know he isn’t a racist.
Yes I have another question. How did you know it was verified Cohen went to Prague?
So defensive when you made it personal.
Congratulations again.
I'll trust the article as much as you trust your grocer and poet.
It doesnt make you look guilty. It means you are guilty.So here is the shaznat with the Stormy Daniels thing:
See, there’s no penalty for refusing to incriminate yourself in a criminal case. But in a civil case, it’s different.
Read more at https://wonkette.com/632520/whats-it...5o8yEJyTyCJ.99
that is ing hilarious.
Pleading the 5th in a civil trial makes you look guilty as .
Im representing someone right now and thats the only strategy we have. If he were to answer truthfully a criminal case would soon follow.
My client prefers going broke as oppossed to going to prison for fraud.
dude worships 4chan posters for pizza rape conspiracies but has a problem with ABC News using anonymous sources
honestly, would your position on any of this change if it was in fact verified with Cohen went to Prague after all this?
Yes my position would change. If it was verified I’d now say two things from the dossier were confirmed.
Were you butthurt I edited your quote to say spook and then called you a racist?
Don't panic, that's just the sound of the Wheels of Justice.
So they found evidence of Clinton colluding but just kept quiet about until now because?
The Clinton Collusion has been common knowledge for quite some time. Now they have evidence. Savvy?
what do you think?
what was the underlying crime in your clinton collusion theory?
Never said anything about collusion being a crime. Clinton indeed colluded though. This is not a theory and Nunes says we have proof now. These are all facts.
hard to really have collusion unless there's an underlying crime...
otherwise every partner colludes in everything
amazing that you can infer answers without direct quotes
Were you butthurt I edited your quote to say spook and then called you a racist?amazing that you can infer answers without direct quotes
of course not. you were able to accurately infer that prior to this post, though. congrats
Kathryn Ruemmler is an interesting person. Look her up. Working behind the scenes with Mueller, she may be a "fixer".
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
