Reply With Quote
Starting Lineup of
C - LMA
F - Gay
F - Tatum
G - Brown
G - Murray
and get a decent pick, hard to pass up. Unlikely to happen.
Granger during his peak years was better than Kawhi ever was tbh. Consider the era. tbh.
Starting Lineup of
C - LMA
F - Gay
F - Tatum
G - Brown
G - Murray
and get a decent pick, hard to pass up. Unlikely to happen.
Kawhi & Gasol for Tatum, Brown and one of their many 1st round picks they will have in next years draft. Or off Ainge!
You stupid
Unlike most people here, I actually watch the games. No one saw him because he played in Indiana, but he was a top 2-3 player during his prime, tbh.
So far the following teams reported to talk to Spurs about trade:
1. Flakers
2. Philly
3. Celtics
4. Cleveland
5. Clippers.
Last edited by BackHome; 04-16-2018 at 03:46 PM.
Well, if we want to see a bidding war, those are the teams you want making offers. Clips will start with Harris and both picks. That will be the opening bid (if you will) and the Lakers will go next offering something around Ingram because they won't want to see kawhi on the clippers. Then the question is, will Cleveland, Philly, or Boston be willing to top those?
If nothing else, it should be interesting..
Totally agree. These people on here thinking teams will shy away from a one year rental. He's a one year rental that's a top 3 MVP candidate and arguably the best twoway player in the league. Some team will believe he's enough to put him over the top and they'll sell the future for a shot now. Look at what Brooklyn did in that trade with the Celtics. We just have to find a few suckers willing to get into a bidding war.
Exactly what I've been saying. You can't get lowballed with a bunch of teams interested. Someone will ALWAYS geek, and then another team will think, "well I cant let THEM get him", and then another team...
Anyone want to take stab at the “bare bones” offer each team would have to make to entice the Spurs?
Yeah, and order of operations, as you suggest, will be key. You want to Clips or Cleveland go first, and then maybe Boston or Philly last.
That would be ideal.
If Cleveland hopes to keep LeBron they have no choice but to bring in someone like Kawhi.
Honestly Cleveland doesn't have enough to offer. We need to get a promising young prospect out of Kawhi at least, someone like Ingram or Tatum.
The Brooklyn pic, Love, zizic, and is man for Kawhi and patty is pretty compelling. We could reroute Love somewhere for additional compensation.
I guess. Would rather get a promising young prospect personally. The draft is just such a crap shoot, even inside the top 10 tbh.
My source says that Boston is actually interested. It's not really news, but there is actual real interest from the Celts. If it actually comes down to it R.C better not mess up and better not do it for less than Tatum, Brown, and their draft pick.
There is real interest from everyone.
True. However, they made it seem like it's serious interest.
I'd like to see Utah and Milwaukee get involved.
I obviously love Mitc , just by himself. And I think Middleton and Parker plus a pick or two could be a nice swap.
Danny had better be prepared to push a BUNCH of chip into the pot. Spurs won’t give him away, knowing what’s in Boston’s cupboard.
Do any of you think Hayward is part of a potential Boston deal? I just don't think Boston wants to pay kawhi, Hayward, horford, and kyrie. I also don't think we would take horford and they won't offer kyrie.
That's penny's on the dollar tbh
top 5 pick + young player x 2 at a minimum
I don't see Hayward being part of the deal. Anything could happen though. If I'm R.C I don't take back long term contracts and anything less than their two young stars and their pick.
Hypothetical question here...if by some chance the Spurs do trade Kawhi for Tatum, Brown, and their pick, would the Spurs have the money to go after LeBron?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions