The Novichok hoax is crumbling on its own weight

[FlAVaK]

So, actually there was no BZ at Salisbury.

What was found by the Swiss Lab was just put there to test the testers...

[Chris]

1) the general public has been told by all official sources that it is russia

Yep.

2) you believe it is a false flag, and therefore you don't believe that it is russia

Yep.

3) you believe the general public has been misled by those official government sources

Never said such.

4) you therefore believe that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public

Never said such.

tell me which of those 4 is wrong, and how it is wrong

Number 3 and 4 are wrong because I didn't say those things.

[Chris]

So, actually there was no BZ at Salisbury.

What was found by the Swiss Lab was just put there to test the testers...

Gotta keep those testers at the top of their game

[hater]

Gotta keep those testers at the top of their game

Especially when ww3 is at stake

[spurraider21]

Chris i know you didn't "say" those things... which is why i said "you believe" and not "you said"

tell me, though... since you confirmed #1 and #2, if official sources have said russia did it (#1), but russia did not actually do it (#2), how can that be characterized as anything but misleading the public (#3)?

and if the general public has been told that it is russia (#1), but it is not actually russia (#2), then how could it be false that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public (#4)?

[spurraider21]

Chris i know you didn't "say" those things... which is why i said "you believe" and not "you said"

tell me, though... since you confirmed #1 and #2, if official sources have said russia did it (#1), but russia did not actually do it (#2), how can that be characterized as anything but misleading the public (#3)?

and if the general public has been told that it is russia (#1), but it is not actually russia (#2), then how could it be false that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public (#4)?

Chris

[spurraider21]

[Chris]

Chris i know you didn't "say" those things... which is why i said "you believe" and not "you said"

tell me, though... since you confirmed #1 and #2, if official sources have said russia did it (#1), but russia did not actually do it (#2), how can that be characterized as anything but misleading the public (#3)?

and if the general public has been told that it is russia (#1), but it is not actually russia (#2), then how could it be false that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public (#4)?

Tell me who are the official sources?

(stealing my memes...SAD!)

[spurraider21]

Tell me who are the official sources?

(stealing my memes...SAD!)

the US and UK governments, for starters. lets go with Theresa May, Boris Johnson, and Donald Trump who have all said that the Russian are responsible.

[Chris]

Going by the statements of General Mattis who has intel neither of us are privy to, I would say it was the Assad regime.

lmk if you need a link for that

[spurraider21]

Going by the statements of General Mattis who has intel neither of us are privy to, I would say it was the Assad regime.

lmk if you need a link for that

you think the assad regime poisoned the two people in the UK?

yes i would love a link for that

[Chris]

Just saying it looked like BZ gas based on the symptoms. You and Pavlov went Hogg wild on me.

I thought the conversation evolved beyond this. Are you still stuck on this?

[spurraider21]

I thought the conversation evolved beyond this. Are you still stuck on this?

...

ok i guess we have to go back a few posts to get all caught up.

first, i asked this.

1) the general public has been told by all official sources that it is russia

2) you believe it is a false flag, and therefore you don't believe that it is russia

3) you believe the general public has been misled by those official government sources

4) you therefore believe that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public

tell me which of those 4 is wrong, and how it is wrong

you said that #1 and #2 are correct. as to #3 and #4, you said "I never said that."

then...

Chris i know you didn't "say" those things... which is why i said "you believe" and not "you said"

tell me, though... since you confirmed #1 and #2, if official sources have said russia did it (#1), but russia did not actually do it (#2), how can that be characterized as anything but misleading the public (#3)?

and if the general public has been told that it is russia (#1), but it is not actually russia (#2), then how could it be false that this event is the product of a plot not currently known to the general public (#4)?

you on the same page, now?

[Chris]

I'm leaning towards a Theresa/Porton bungle for right now.

Did you miss this?

[spurraider21]

Did you miss this?

no. so who do you think is actually behind the poisoning?

[Chris]

no. so who do you think is actually behind the poisoning?

Do you know who Theresa May is?

[Pavlov]

Do you know who Theresa May is?

How did they "bungle" the poisoning according to you?

[Chris]

How did they "bungle" the poisoning according to you?

How would I know that?

[Pavlov]

How would I know that?

You're the one who said it was their bungle. You came to this conclusion somehow.

[Chris]

You're the one who said it was their bungle. You came to this conclusion somehow.

It's called a theory. Even qualified it with "leaning."

lol conclusion

[Pavlov]

It's called a theory. Even qualified it with "leaning."

lol conclusion

It's your theory; how did bungling become your hypothesis?

[Chris]

It's your theory; how did bungling become your hypothesis?

Motive to start a war with Russia. Theresa May is acting on behalf of the EU and Merkel. Russia is the last great frontier for the Globalist bankers to conquer.

[Pavlov]

Motive to start a war with Russia. Theresa May is acting on behalf of the EU and Merkel. Russia is the last great frontier for the Globalist bankers to conquer.

if they wanted to start a war they could've done it years ago over Ukraine.

Remember Ukraine?

[spurraider21]

Do you know who Theresa May is?

ah i see. i thought you meant Theresa May bungled the investigation and just ended up being wrong about it being Russian.

but now i see you are saying Theresa May is in some capacity behind the poisoning

Ok good, we're making progress, almost done here...

If Theresa May is in some way responsible for the poisoning, wouldn't it be accurate to say that she has misled the public?

[Chris]

If Theresa May is in some way responsible for the poisoning, wouldn't it be accurate to say that she has misled the public?

Yes, that would be accurate.