Reply With Quote
Yep, combine those with the Trump tweets and the jury will have no choice.
Sorry about your buddy, Chris
muh confederate flag
Yep, combine those with the Trump tweets and the jury will have no choice.
still butthurt over a legal concept you don't understand.
Attachment A doesn't mention Hillary.
Dont know, haven't read it--unlikely to read it.I clicked your link. How many pages deep do I need to go?
But that doesn't mean others wont or that the book won't sell.
Did you ever watch Trump talk about that pee pee tape? Look it up on youtube.
Dude totally did it. hole-y that answer made him sound guilty as .
Attachment A.
Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that.
Did you see Trump's answer to it when he was asked about it Darrin?Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that.
Manafort was under investigation because Mueller suspected he was Trump's back channel to Russia
Paul Manafort’s attorneys have been arguing in court that in prosecuting Manafort, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has exceeded his authority.
The idea that Mueller was in the weeds is completely belied by the letter that Mueller’s team produced,
showing the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had specifically authorized Mueller to investigate the areas for which Manfort is being prosecuted.
But as Manafort’s legal team has continued in their attempts to find some way to invalidate the charges—
other than demonstrating Manafort’s innocence, which seems patently impossible—
it has spurred additional information from the DOJ on just why Mueller was looking at Manafort.
Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s interest in former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort stemmed in part from his suspected role as a “back channel” between the campaign and Russians intent on meddling in the election, a Justice Department lawyer told a judge.
Previously, all the dots were in place.
Manafort had connections to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
He had contact with Deripaska during the campaign,
as well as contact with convicted attorney Alex van Der Zwaan,
who is not only the son-in-law of a prominent Russian banker,
but also a link to “Person A,” who has been identified as GRU agent Konstantin Kilimnik.
Which means that Manafort’s charges are not just related to Mueller’s investigation.
They’re the primary reason there was an investigation in the first place.
What Paul Manafort did, is exactly what the FBI set out to find when they started looking at the Trump campaign.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...tail=emaildkre
Desperate times call for desperate measures.
"DNC chairman Tom Perez commented on the impending legal battle Friday, saying the move was “not partisan, it’s patriotic."
How do you sue Russia?
They're suing the Russian government. It probably won't fly but that's how you sue Russia.How do you sue Russia?
And the USC trip was a weekend. This should not be hard. OH btw, if you are going to post links at me and not quote the salient portion of the article, I am not going to bother reading them myself. You likely have not read the link beyond the headline and I would rather not waste my time.
These are tactics to drown Trump and the GOP into more Russia . It won't go anywhere of course but as long as the Russian narrative stays in the public sphere, it's a problem heading into the midterms.
Democrats taking a play from the republican playbook for once.
The context of that ask is Trump asking for loyalty and worries that his wife might believe it. the story is not exculpatory no matter how hard you wish for it, dim.Yeah, a guilty person would surely ask the FBI director to investigate that.
Seems like a really dumb idea by the Democrats. They’re opening up Crowdstrike and Perkins Coie to deposition.These are tactics to drown Trump and the GOP into more Russia . It won't go anywhere of course but as long as the Russian narrative stays in the public sphere, it's a problem heading into the midterms.
Democrats taking a play from the republican playbook for once.
TRUMP FUNDRAISER OFFERED RUSSIAN GAS COMPANY PLAN TO GET SANCTIONS LIFTED FOR $26 MILLION
https://theintercept.com/2018/04/20/...ssia-sanctions
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
