Reply With Quote
Gay
Mills?
Manu?
Gay?
Gay
Manu then Gay then Mills
Manu, then Gay, then 50
Mills (surprisingly) or Gay.
Mills
Gay
Manu
Definitely Mills or Manu..Gay was absolutely terrible in this series..
Manu Mills Gay
Mills.
Manu then Mills
Gay was trash.
Manu was pretty solid, tbh. His shooting was good. He got into the lane and finished. He did well on defense. His playmaking for others was good.
Just like the regular season, nobody really stepped up to be a clear #2 to LMA.
I guess I'll say Manu.
I would probably say Manu.
Ginobili. Gay had his moments, but his defense was terrible when it mattered.
I've been watching a lot of playoff basketball and it does strike me that the Spurs just don't have any talent. This team could be really bad. They need a complete rebuild.
Manu easily
Mills and Gay. Manu was great the last few games.
Rudy Gay had a TS% of 44% to go along with bad defense
44% for a scoring specialist who doesn't do anything else is abhorrent..
Gay was also just beyond terrible at the rim.
I’d say Manu. Without his playmaking and clutchness they don’t take game 4, or make some games including the elimination game, close.
Gay was awful. Agreed with Harlem.
Paddy shot the ball better than he did last season against them and competed really hard and that has to be admired, but he was exploited defensively nearly every possession ... if he’s your second best player or even your best guard you should be thankful you even got to the playoffs to begin with and didn’t go home in 4...Rudy Gay had a TS% of 44% to go along with bad defense
44% for a scoring specialist who doesn't do anything else is abhorrent..
Ginobili
Manu, Mills and Gay
Manu what says a lot about how ed Pop and RC has built this team when your second best player is 40 years old. WTF
Gay by miles
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
