Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 66 of 66
  1. #51
    "The ball don't lie." dbestpro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    10,459
    The team needs better balance. Murray can be a great PG with better shooters, and scorers. The same can be said for Fathead as a SF. LMA carried the team but the team still will not win it all while playing iso ball. Forbes needs to learn to play defense. There are only about a thousand things that they need to do to fix this team.

  2. #52
    Veteran SASdynasty!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    3,317
    Murray ain't even 22 yet... And stop comparing his numbers to a HOF point guard... Males u look silly... Most point guards don't even get to play in the playoffs at 21...besides that, Murray didn't even play 30 minutes per game
    Parker at 19 years old averaged over 17 PPG on 50% against the greatest defensive PG of all time in his 1st playoff series.
    Murray, who is 2 years older, playing in his 4th series, couldn’t average 8 PPG on worse shooting and couldn’t average 2 assists.

    I’m not saying he has to be HOF, but when your starting PG can’t average 2 APG or score and already has playoff experience, there’s a major problem.

  3. #53
    Believe. DaBears's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Post Count
    930
    We all realized that SPURS glaring weakness this season was athleticism & shooting. Those 2 key areas must get addressed. I personally think this is it for MANU( hats off to him) great career. Parker while he has his moments cannot break the defense down anymore or beak his defender down 1on 1 anymore. If those areas are address this off-season then SPURS should be in good position next season.
    Seriously look at the crappy Small forward and guard play we had and we still could have had the 3-4th best record in the West.
    DG - should come off the bench for a real SG who knows how to dribble or be moved via trade. Respect him and all he has done for SA, but time to go.
    id be down to what White could offer from the PG position. Boy can shoot and breakdown a defense in half court set.

  4. #54
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    The problem with Murray isn't just his shot (though it will obviously improve some, virtually every big PG's tops out as below average shooter), it's the lack of a single foundational offensive attribute (speed, quickness) or skill (ball handling, finishing, passing, vision) to build off of. He might physically look and sound the part of a foundational player, but if he wasn't a Spur, I question how many would feel confident in his becoming one.

    He also times poorly with the majority of the roster, specifically Aldridge. Even if he becomes the star many seem to think, Aldridge won't be at that point, leaving them in the same position they're in now.

    But the only scenario where I don't think Murray is the starter, is if Leonard is traded and it's to the 76ers, with Fultz being the centerpiece of the package


    This is going to be unpopular, but I'm okay with them giving Mills and Murray more time as the starting backcourt. They complement each other well. In a world where Kawhi stays, Patty is a good fit for the SL. Murray should get more time to develop. I've been quite pleased with his progress so far, but him getting real offense is critical to his future, and this is the off-season where that needs to happen. I'd never rule out making a move for an All-Star caliber PG if one becomes available. But like a few others on the team, he deserves a chance to show what he's got after an off-season where he knows what's going on.

    Still think they need to upgrade the overall guard talent though, and that includes finding a guy who can be a real sixth man. Manu and Parker and Green should be out the door (though Danny opting in and being traded would be better than him just walking). White should get a chance at a rotation spot, but the team needs to use whatever flexibility they have on getting a vet guard to run with him. Dunno who'd that'd be.

    Team definitely needs a big in the draft though, but I guess if someone like Trae Young falls, you've gotta take him and figure everything else out later.


    Mills, Murray and Parker, will more than likely comprise 75% of the guard rotation. Murray and Parker can't play together offensively, while Mills and Parker can't play together defensively. So by default, that means Mills and Murray have to be paired together.

    Murray and Parker are useless off ball and a dynamic guard would be wasted playing off ball next to inferior offensive players. In other words, they don't need to bring the latter in to supplement those two, but upgrade them (which isn't happening).


  5. #55
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    This is going to be unpopular, but I'm okay with them giving Mills and Murray more time as the starting backcourt. They complement each other well. In a world where Kawhi stays, Patty is a good fit for the SL. Murray should get more time to develop. I've been quite pleased with his progress so far, but him getting real offense is critical to his future, and this is the off-season where that needs to happen. I'd never rule out making a move for an All-Star caliber PG if one becomes available. But like a few others on the team, he deserves a chance to show what he's got after an off-season where he knows what's going on.

    Still think they need to upgrade the overall guard talent though, and that includes finding a guy who can be a real sixth man. Manu and Parker and Green should be out the door (though Danny opting in and being traded would be better than him just walking). White should get a chance at a rotation spot, but the team needs to use whatever flexibility they have on getting a vet guard to run with him. Dunno who'd that'd be.

    Team definitely needs a big in the draft though, but I guess if someone like Trae Young falls, you've gotta take him and figure everything else out later.
    Its not unpopular. Its just stupid. A catch and shoot three pointer and a visionless pg who cant play off ball. Stick to salary cap

  6. #56
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Murray/White back-court should work just fine

  7. #57
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    Murray/White back-court should work just fine
    Re

  8. #58
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,195
    White will be a good PG he is 6’4 has great handles good vision likes to dish and able to attack rim. It’s a shame he didn’t get more playing time cause we would have gotten 50 wins for sure. I am not giving g up on Murray but may the best man win.

  9. #59
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    13,102
    White will be a good PG he is 6’4 has great handles good vision likes to dish and able to attack rim. It’s a shame he didn’t get more playing time cause we would have gotten 50 wins for sure. I am not giving g up on Murray but may the best man win.
    Agreed White is good to have because he's going to push Murray to get better. Murray better develop a jump shot or he could lose his starting job to White.

  10. #60
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    The problem with Murray isn't just his shot (though it will obviously improve some, virtually every big PG's tops out as below average shooter), it's the lack of a single foundational offensive attribute (speed, quickness) or skill (ball handling, finishing, passing, vision) to build off of. He might physically look and sound the part of a foundational player, but if he wasn't a Spur, I question how many would feel confident in his becoming one.

    He also times poorly with the majority of the roster, specifically Aldridge. Even if he becomes the star many seem to think, Aldridge won't be at that point, leaving them in the same position they're in now.

    But the only scenario where I don't think Murray is the starter, is if Leonard is traded and it's to the 76ers, with Fultz being the centerpiece of the package




    Mills, Murray and Parker, will more than likely comprise 75% of the guard rotation. Murray and Parker can't play together offensively, while Mills and Parker can't play together defensively. So by default, that means Mills and Murray have to be paired together.

    Murray and Parker are useless off ball and a dynamic guard would be wasted playing off ball next to inferior offensive players. In other words, they don't need to bring the latter in to supplement those two, but upgrade them (which isn't happening).

    Good post.
    Basically, unless there's a trade, hoping Murray improves and looking forward to White is all there is. We shall see. I have more hope in white than I do Murray at this point. His lack of shooting wouldn't bother me so much if he had other PG skills as you said. He's poor running a PNR. He's below average getting to the basket and finishing. I agree with you that if he wasn't a Spur people wouldn't bat an eye or propose trades to get him... There's things to like about him tho, so hoping for the best at this point.

  11. #61
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Parker at 19 years old averaged over 17 PPG on 50% against the greatest defensive PG of all time in his 1st playoff series.
    Murray, who is 2 years older, playing in his 4th series, couldn’t average 8 PPG on worse shooting and couldn’t average 2 assists.

    I’m not saying he has to be HOF, but when your starting PG can’t average 2 APG or score and already has playoff experience, there’s a major problem.
    Name other point guards at Murray's age that have done better... There is a very short list... And all of them were chosen higher... U are setting the bar way too high... Dude is 21...Parker was up against an old Payton... And played with Duncan... Come on now... Murray isn't playing with anyone of that caliber... AND he isn't a hall of famer... For goodness sakes Murray has been playing better than Fultz... And Fultz is the first pick! Relax

  12. #62
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Don't get why ppl say Murray can't dribble... The guy clearly has a lot of ball handling skill... You dumb s make him seem like Danny Green... And with all the talks of his turnovers he has been averaging a very small amount after the all star break when he was made the starter...

    He makes great reads and passes at times... U rarely see a point guard at his age averaging a ton of assists... And u would never see it with the type of offense we were running this year... Murray's minutes and role on offense (very low usage rate) wouldn't permit him to get a lot of assists... Combine that with the type of teammates he had that could barely hit a three, or finish at the rim, and u begin to see the issue...

  13. #63
    Veteran SpursDynasty85's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,890
    Don't get why ppl say Murray can't dribble... The guy clearly has a lot of ball handling skill... You dumb s make him seem like Danny Green... And with all the talks of his turnovers he has been averaging a very small amount after the all star break when he was made the starter...

    He makes great reads and passes at times... U rarely see a point guard at his age averaging a ton of assists... And u would never see it with the type of offense we were running this year... Murray's minutes and role on offense (very low usage rate) wouldn't permit him to get a lot of assists... Combine that with the type of teammates he had that could barely hit a three, or finish at the rim, and u begin to see the issue...
    Bro. You getting ahead of yourself. Murray's handles and offense for a pg in today's NBA is probably near dead last. The point is: he made strides this year and is a great defensive pg now. Even the defensive part took him a while and I think because he was getting noticed for his defense he became more confident in the offensive end as well. If he can shoot with the c ok confidence he did in game 4 consistently the we might have something. But that was just one game.

  14. #64
    The St. Croix Boy duncan2k5's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    5,962
    Bro. You getting ahead of yourself. Murray's handles and offense for a pg in today's NBA is probably near dead last. The point is: he made strides this year and is a great defensive pg now. Even the defensive part took him a while and I think because he was getting noticed for his defense he became more confident in the offensive end as well. If he can shoot with the c ok confidence he did in game 4 consistently the we might have something. But that was just one game.
    Nah bro... Every scout had Murrysville handles as one of his strengths... and when u watch the games, he is supper quick with it on his crossovers... He had issue with being shaky, but I promise u that had a lot to do with nerves... He hasn't had that issue once he became comfortable in the second half of the season... He rarely turned the ball over

  15. #65
    foaming at the nostrils raybies's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    6,472
    Y’all ready to give up on Murray is silly. The kid is mad young. Y’all wanted to give up on Aldridge last year against these same Warriors and look the difference a year makes... The kids advantage at this point of his career is his length at position. Unfortunately for him tho, Kerr decided to go big rather than let him go off with Cook guarding him. The dude was guarded by elite defenders that were all bigger than him. Thompson, Iggy, Durant, and Draymond... That’s a bad matchup unfortunately.

    But as for skill he’s not that far off. Just needs to hit the corner three, elbow two and floater consistently and the kid will be an all star. All things he flashed this season and series. His playmaking and vision is underrated and the way y’all make it sound is like he doesn’t have any. The kid became a borderline elite defender in two years which was always the first step to realizing his potential. With this kids work ethic and at ude I think it’s a bad bet that he’s incapable of improving offensively. I look forward to him at the helm next year and believe he should have the minimum of his rookie contract to see where he is.

  16. #66
    Veteran SpursDynasty85's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    2,890
    Nah bro... Every scout had Murrysville handles as one of his strengths... and when u watch the games, he is supper quick with it on his crossovers... He had issue with being shaky, but I promise u that had a lot to do with nerves... He hasn't had that issue once he became comfortable in the second half of the season... He rarely turned the ball over
    I've seen his scouting highlights. He looked nothing like an NBA pg. He was a young Jamal Crawford. pg handles are a totally different beast imo. Have you seen the drills these guys have to do now in the offseason? Its ridiculous.

    What I will say is Murray does not appear like crossing people and taking it to the hoop in the half court like TP, CP3, or other great pgs could do will happen. Murray currently runs sets that allow him to do very little dribble penetration. He kind of drifts away from penetration and gives it off to the bigs to distribute or Mills and Manu. Actually, even when he matures his game I am not sure this NBA will have seen anything like him. He is like a long skinny grasshopper. Maybe a young Shaun Livingston type player? He doesn't have quite the knack for scoring as Crawford.. .. Who do you think he can develop into?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •