It's almost as if this article was written just for you
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...kers-rewarded/
It's the very fact that the information was so potentially explosive that it never made it to the actual campaign. You only have to take a look at TSA's lack of any coherent conspiracy theory and the wall-of-text/tweets pseudo-intellectual 5-D chess triple Lindys the right wingers have to do to come close to explaining almost anything that is going on in this investigation.
It's almost as if this article was written just for you
https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/...kers-rewarded/
that didn't answer the question at all tbh
Yeah, I already said you would try that tired argument.
It doesn't work.
There was no reason to "entrap" Trump as you claim if they thought they were going to win.
That article is another example of the triple Lindys the right has to do to try to explain anything.
If she thought she was going to win -- why do all that in the first place?
I would like your answer TSA. Not blog's.
If he did win they thought they'd be able to use the Russia hoax to bring him down and get him impeached, they are still trying. Unfortunately for them they were sloppy and it's all starting to publicly be exposed.
But not use it to -- you know -- actually be elected.
You were fine with the idea of Clinton's eating babies but using the Trump Tower meeting was way too evil for her.
lol
I don't think the Clinton campaign saying Carter Page went to Moscow would have had any effect on the outcome of the election.
No, you said Clinton knew everything that was going on. That means the Trump Tower meeting. That means everything in the dossier.
You were fine with the idea of her eating babies but releasing that information in order to be elected was way too evil for her.
lol
Show me the quote where I said Clinton knew everything that was going on, or just admit you were talking out of your ass and save us both the time.
You intimated she knew all about Steele and the Trump Tower meeting. So you're saying Clinton didn't know about the dossier or the Trump Tower meeting?
Make your position perfectly clear, TSA.
You found no quote, you were just talking out of your ass. Why do you just make up?
You intimated she knew all about Steele and the Trump Tower meeting. So you're saying Clinton didn't know about the dossier or the Trump Tower meeting?
Make your position perfectly clear, TSA.
Lol at immediately walking back “everything”
Pretty much everything damaging that could be released before the election. You intimated she knew all about Steele and the Trump Tower meeting. So you're saying Clinton didn't know about the dossier or the Trump Tower meeting?
Make your position perfectly clear, TSA.
im not seeing anything from conservativetreehouse answering that question... so i wouldn't hold my breath
Yeah, he's already stalling with semantics. Other tactics incoming.
I’m still waiting for you to back your claim with a quote from me saying Clinton knew everything that was going on.
lol semantics.
I do hereby amend my initial claim and now only include the damaging information that could be released before the election, specifically the Trump Tower meeting and the Steele dossier. You intimated she knew all about Steele and the Trump Tower meeting. So you're saying Clinton didn't know about the dossier or the Trump Tower meeting?
Make your position perfectly clear, TSA.
The only question is whether TSA will use the same stalling tactic or try a new one.
Yeah, he is careful in his innuendo. I'm still gonna make fun of him though. "it's a trap"...![]()
I am guessing the latter. In before he shifts tactics.![]()
I think he'll try the same tactic, just amping up the faux indignation.
[Mueller subpoenas Trump Organization in Russia investigation]
Wile E. TSA soooper genyus.
Maybe he will claim that the leaked Mueller questions are all about the "trap" too.
Double down would be a shift in tactic from semantics.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)