HRC: "Being A Capitalist Probably Hurt Me Because So Many Democrats Are Socialists"

[AaronY]

$52k minimum wage

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=271253

Never forget lmao

[Isitjustme?]

Australian minimum wage is equivalent to over US $13 an hour, but what’s +30%, right Chris?

Low wages, high debts, and the housing bubble while having one of the highest rates of population growth in the developed world. Household debt is high and rising, while wage growth is at record lows. Inevitable growth in the United States and China will lead to inflation. Gun bans and gun grabs - no thanks.

[Th'Pusher]

They’ve moved in from Hillary. I personally have moved on to generally disagreeing with the current president while pointing out his utterly ridiculous and hypocritical behavior.

[DMX7]

HRC is living rent free as a capitalist in the minds of Fox News viewers.

[Down Under]

High wages, low debt, lower morbidity, lower homelessness, lower crime, more equality, superannuation for retirement & no arrests for possessing mary j

[Down Under]

& no permit required to sell lemonade in your front yard

[ElNono]

Just another cuck first lady, tbh...

[Spurtacular]

What's wrong with her chest?

Chump's hag keeps the excuse train chugging.
When did she ever tout her capitalism?
This contradicts her four-minute abs excuse.

[DMC]

Hillary all up in Chris' head rent-free man.

LOL obsessing over my failed presidential candidate.

fify

[dabom]

How to know what Hillary says nowadays.... ...talk to a repug.

[Chris]

Chump's hag keeps the excuse train chugging.
When did she ever tout her capitalism?
This contradicts her four-minute abs excuse.

She's trying to separate herself now completely from the Bernie bros while passive aggressively blaming Democrats for being Socialists and not voting for her. She's alienating group after group weaving her lies with excuses. Trump did a number on her.

[Mikeanaro]

I’m not whining. The woman literally never crosses my mind unless conservatives on this board bring her up. Liberals have moved on. Let us know when you catch up.

Are you sure? they sued Trump campaign, Russia and Wikileaks like a week ago because she is such a sore loser.
And she is still the head of the DNC AFAIK.

[Spurtacular]

They’ve moved in from Hillary. I personally have moved on to generally disagreeing with the current president while pointing out his utterly ridiculous and hypocritical behavior.

Of course you're trying to distance yourself from your hag loser. Don't push a corrupt dirt bag onto us next time if you don't like having to hear about her after the fact.

Also at Mikeanaro shi**ing all over your post, too.

[ElNono]

Are you sure? they sued Trump campaign, Russia and Wikileaks like a week ago because she is such a sore loser.
And she is still the head of the DNC AFAIK.

Thomas Perez has been the head of the DNC since 2017, IIRC...

[ElNono]

You would certainly hope the Dems moved on from her, tbh... I still think she's going to try to influence , which is terrible...

[Mikeanaro]

Thomas Perez has been the head of the DNC since 2017, IIRC...

You know very well who is pulling the strings.
Thats why they keep the collusion narrative, which I find pretty stupid but since they have nothing to offer whats best than ¨HE IS EVIL¨ campaign?

[ElNono]

Also, the lawsuit is a complete no-brainer for the DNC, in the sense that they're not looking for dethrone Trump, they just want compensation for the email hacks, in the event a connection to Russia is found by Mueller (which can't make the results of his investigation public, but, could be sought under seal by a judge). Plus, they already got hacked and their emails leaked, so there's little to lose in what the GOP could find out in discovery that they don't already know...

[ElNono]

You know very well who is pulling the strings.
Thats why they keep the collusion narrative, which I find pretty stupid but since they have nothing to offer whats best than ¨HE IS EVIL¨ campaign?

The collusion thing is going to circle around as long as Mueller is around. Obviously, the DNC wants to politically and monetarily benefit from it, in case it's true. It's a low-risk, high-gain move for them.

They already played this same playbook successfully in the Nixon years.

[Mikeanaro]

Dems campaign...

THIS IS TRUMP!!!


This just in! Donald Trump sleeps in an oxygen tent he believes gives him sexual powers!

[Mikeanaro]

The collusion thing is going to circle around as long as Mueller is around. Obviously, the DNC wants to politically and monetarily benefit from it, in case it's true. It's a low-risk, high-gain move for them.

They already played this same playbook successfully in the Nixon years.

Is not the same scenario, Nixon was a long time politician he even ran against Kennedy, Trump is a newcomer with no political past and Obama was the one spying on him.
No machines were hacked, no evidence but they want to keep digging until they find he had a speeding ticket or something stupid, and the Stormy thing is another low story and Im pretty sure it happened but it was more than 10 years ago, he is a billionaire this is pure circus.

Now Dems are the ones refusing to give their servers and do ents...

[ElNono]

Is not the same scenario, Nixon was a long time politician he even ran against Kennedy, Trump is a newcomer with no political past and Obama was the one spying on him.
No machines were hacked, no evidence but they want to keep digging until they find he had a speeding ticket or something stupid, and the Stormy thing is another low story and Im pretty sure it happened but it was more than 10 years ago, he is a billionaire this is pure circus.

Now Dems are the ones refusing to give their servers and do ents...

The lawsuit echoes a similar legal tactic that the Democratic Party used during the Watergate scandal. In 1972, the DNC sued President Richard Nixon’s reelection committee seeking $1 million in damages for the break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building.

The suit was denounced at the time by Nixon’s attorney general, John Mitc , who called it a case of “sheer demagoguery” by the DNC. But the civil action brought by the DNC’s chairman, Lawrence F. O’Brien, was successful, yielding a $750,000 settlement from the Nixon campaign that was reached on the day in 1974 that he left office.

Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor who specializes in computer-fraud cases, said he thought the Democrats’ suit had merit and, despite predictions from Trump-allied lawyers, was unlikely to go away anytime soon.

“There is no way it’s going to be dismissed,” said Akerman, a partner in the New York office of the Dorsey & Whitney law firm. “At least not on the computer-fraud part of the case, which is really the heart of it. The Democrats have every right to bring this suit as they are aggrieved. My question is: What took them so long?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...4c7_story.html

The DNC was hacked, the emails spread everywhere, including Wikileaks... that's how Donna Brazile lost her job. Was it Russia? I have no idea, but the lawsuit is a no-brainer looking at that.

[Chris]

Dems campaign...

THIS IS TRUMP!!!


This just in! Donald Trump sleeps in an oxygen tent he believes gives him sexual powers!

Not a far cry

[boutons_deux]

You would certainly hope the Dems moved on from her, tbh... I still think she's going to try to influence , which is terrible...

she probably will, but the Dem establishment is fully neo-liberal, well right of center, so Hillary/Bill influence will be in line with the Dem establishment.

Her crack about "so many Dems being socialist" ( (well) to the left of center) was pejorative, not surprising at all from a person who adores, is to BigFinance.

[Mikeanaro]

The lawsuit echoes a similar legal tactic that the Democratic Party used during the Watergate scandal. In 1972, the DNC sued President Richard Nixon’s reelection committee seeking $1 million in damages for the break-in at Democratic headquarters in the Watergate building.

The suit was denounced at the time by Nixon’s attorney general, John Mitc , who called it a case of “sheer demagoguery” by the DNC. But the civil action brought by the DNC’s chairman, Lawrence F. O’Brien, was successful, yielding a $750,000 settlement from the Nixon campaign that was reached on the day in 1974 that he left office.

Nick Akerman, a former Watergate prosecutor who specializes in computer-fraud cases, said he thought the Democrats’ suit had merit and, despite predictions from Trump-allied lawyers, was unlikely to go away anytime soon.

“There is no way it’s going to be dismissed,” said Akerman, a partner in the New York office of the Dorsey & Whitney law firm. “At least not on the computer-fraud part of the case, which is really the heart of it. The Democrats have every right to bring this suit as they are aggrieved. My question is: What took them so long?”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...4c7_story.html

The DNC was hacked, the emails spread everywhere, including Wikileaks... that's how Donna Brazile lost her job. Was it Russia? I have no idea, but the lawsuit is a no-brainer looking at that.

You are right on that, but if I were them I would look for a less pathetic tactic anyway.
Their candidate was a joke, no one likes Hilda.
Trump could sue them too for the CNN questions during the debate, all would be a giant crying game with ¨hurt mah feelens¨ from both sides.
Dont like that liberal world, tbh.

[Pavlov]

You are right on that, but if I were them I would look for a less pathetic tactic anyway.
Their candidate was a joke, no one likes Hilda.

McGovern actually lost the popular vote.

Trump could sue them too for the CNN questions during the debate

How? Which questions?