Reply With Quote
Are you more confident today that Mueller will bring indictments against Trump campaign members for colluding with Russia to alter the election than you were when Mueller was first appointed Special Counsel?
Pretty much the same tbh. I always considered it a longshot. Dennison made it a little easier to believe with his moves to obstruct justice.
Are you more confident today that Mueller will bring indictments against Trump campaign members for colluding with Russia to alter the election than you were when Mueller was first appointed Special Counsel?
Pretty much the same tbh.
On a scale of 1-10 how would you rate your confidence today on indictments coming concerning Trump/Russia election collusion?
Lawdy!
Can't put a number to it. "Confidence" is a loaded term anyway.
What did blog tell you that made you go on this angle today?
Is James Woods a legal scholar? (Srs question)
he was a lawyer on true believer
DOJ inspector general's testimony postponed, amid new leads in Clinton case review
Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s widely anticipated testimony next week before the House Oversight Committee has been postponed, as the Justice Department IG has pursued new leads in his review of the Hillary Clinton email investigation, according to a congressional letter and sources familiar with the matter.
“It is of the utmost importance that your review be as fulsome, complete and unimpeded as possible,” Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., the chairman of the committee, wrote in a recent letter to Horowitz obtained by Fox News.
Horowitz was scheduled to appear before the committee on May 8. But Gowdy told Horowitz he wants to reschedule his testimony “as close to the day the report is finalized as is practicable.”
Gowdy said the decision to postpone is based on “the representations” in an April 23 letter from Horowitz.
DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s widely anticipated testimony has been postponed.
The developments suggest Horowitz is still working to complete his review of the FBI and DOJ's handling of the Clinton case. Sources familiar with the review have told Fox News that Horowitz has continued to pursue new leads and witnesses in recent weeks.
During a speech Friday, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein said he expects Horowitz’s review will be finalized soon.
“Within the next few weeks, I anticipate that our inspector general will complete a comprehensive, fair and nonpartisan report that answers many questions about how the Department of Justice handled a high-profile investigation during the last presidential campaign,” Rosenstein said. “We will learn from it, and our Department will do better in the future.”
Elements of a related review already have been made public. In April, a Horowitz review faulted former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for his role in a media leak about the Clinton Foundation. In that report, Horowitz said McCabe lied four times -- three times under oath -- and referred the matter to the U.S. Attorney’s office for possible criminal prosecution.
McCabe has vowed to fight the allegations, saying then-FBI Director James Comey knew of his media engagement with the Wall Street Journal, but wanted to distance himself from disclosures.
Horowitz’s forthcoming report is also expected to examine actions taken at the bureau by Comey. The former director confirmed in an interview with Fox News last week that he had spoken with Horowitz’s team about his handling of memos do enting his conversations with President Trump.
Gowdy did not set a new date for the testimony, but, considering the short congressional calendar in May, it’s possible Horowitz’s testimony could be put off until June.
Fox News’ Jake Gibson contributed to this report.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...se-review.html
Was he giving a legal opinion?
James Woods.
Extended investigations good now.DOJ inspector general's testimony postponed, amid new leads in Clinton case review
No. He's simply using hyperbole and being facetious. Also lying about the judge's actual statement.
If he doesn't follow court cases it could be something that happens twice a week for all we know
Oh ya, forgout dat. Good movie tbh.
Called it.Further, Ellis demanded to see the unredacted “scope memo,” a do ent outlining the scope of the special counsel’s Russia probe that congressional Republicans have also sought.
Easiest prediction I've ever made.
Blog will demand it next, followed closely by TSA.
But you want the Mueller investigation to end right now without knowing anything about it.
I'm with the general consensus on that, yes.
Is that the way you think investigations should be run? By Rasmussen poll?
Yes or no.
No.
What is Mueller investigating specifically?
So why use it as a reason an investigation should end?
The unredacted parts of the memo are available for you to read at any time.What is Mueller investigating specifically?
You won't do it.
The ol' white flag.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
