Sure looks like it.
Remember when Q said Trump would declare martial law while flying on AF1?
What is the picture, Chris?
alt-Reich LARPers
Yeah, that's what I think.
What are you saying is the picture Q described, white Chris?
I'm not.
What is Q saying is the picture, white Chris?
You posted it.
Theoretically speaking I would say that they need to clean house at the FBI before you start seeing real charges being filed.
Theoretically, what charges?
Theoretically:
Deprivation of Rights
Obstruction before Congress
False Statements and Concealing
Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Do ents or Material
Obstruction of Proceedings
Embezzlement
Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information
Perjury
Contributions and Donations by Foreign Nationals
Federal Election Campaign Disclosure of Funds
Treason
Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
Whats your theory Pavlov?
That there won't be anything on that scale.
You made some pretty specific charges -- which person(s) do you say committed each crime?
Those persons were already named in the original picture Pavlov. Theoretically, you could apply blanket charges for each individual and whittle it down after they clean house. You don't think any charges will be filed or at least on that scale, so you must be convinced there was nary wrongdoing. Can you explain me to me why you think that?
That's not how the law works, Chris.
Give it another try.
I haven't seen any evidence that would lead to that load of charges.
The law definitely doesn't work the way you described it and it looks like you won't make another attempt at explaining who would be facing what charge. I accept your white flag.
What evidence have you seen that would lead to any charges?
Doesn't really matter what charges I assign to each individual if they already are working with investigators for more lenient punishments. Again this is you asking for an impossible, and declaring victory. I accept your routine tap out.The law definitely doesn't work the way you described it and it looks like you won't make another attempt at explaining who would be facing what charge. I accept your white flag.
Not much outside the process crimes.
No, it's not impossible to ask you who you think will be charged with the specific crimes you listed. If you can't do name actual perpetrators of these crimes, there was no reason to list the crimes.Doesn't really matter what charges I assign to each individual if they already are working with investigators for more lenient punishments. Again this is you asking for an impossible, and declaring victory. I accept your routine tap out.
You can't have a crime if no one committed it.
Can you be more specific with which individual and which process crime(s)?
Rybicki - Obstruction of Proceedings, Deprivation of Rights, Obstruction before CongressNo, it's not impossible to ask you who you think will be charged with the specific crimes you listed. If you can't do name actual perpetrators of these crimes, there was no reason to list the crimes.
You can't have a crime if no one committed it.
Baker - Obstruction of Proceedings, Deprivation of Rights, Obstruction before Congress
McCabe - False Statements and Concealing, Obstruction of Proceedings, Perjury
Comey - Obstruction of Proceedings, Obstruction before Congress, Embezzlement, Gathering, Transmitting, or Losing Defense Information, Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Do ents or Material, Perjury, False Statements and Concealing
Priestap - Obstruction of Proceedings, Deprivation of Rights, Obstruction before Congress
Strzok - Obstruction of Proceedings, Obstruction before Congress
Page - Obstruction of Proceedings, Obstruction before Congress
lol so many process crimes.
Nothing burger.
Future Communications/Commands
ELE = election/midterms?
SEC = secretary/secondary?
DIR = director(y)/directives?
CAP = capacity/???
[OnReady] = Sessions/Pompeo?
Pre_stage = ball is in motion
Q
but what does all that mean?
it’s beautiful
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)