#StillWithHer
You seriously post this gimp sh** pretty much verbatim in like half the threads you post in.
#StillWithHer
No one has to be with anyone to know she lives rent free in your heads.
![]()
1. The CIA spies, participates in murder and mayhem, sabotages, rigs elections, "tortures", etc and with surprisingly little accountability. These are do ented descriptions of their activities, many of which they have admitted to doing. Who is taking it on "trust faith" that they're a wonderful organization? That is apparently you.
2. Even if these activities had not been do ented, I'd still say that you're the one taking it on faith. I've learned that power unchecked leads to very bad things. Abraham Lincoln said as much. You are very much the one taking it on faith that the CIA are the good guys.
You wouldn't worry about it if you weren't #StillWithHer![]()
Why specifically do you think they run this website?
lol "worried"
You simply can't deny she's living rent free in your heads.
I've never claimed that. But I would figure that they are connected directly or indirectly.
"rent free" is Pavlov's new white flag
She lost the election and was put out to pasture. Your claim is weak on its face. But apparently you need to lash out cos you're still quite butthurt.
Why? What is your evidence?
Clinton's been your white flag for a year and a half.
You keep talking about her.
You use the same funnels over and over, bro.
Just say you have no reason or evidence.
Maybe it's time to heal on the cheap, dude.
(I Dunno) What Happened? for $1.99
https://www.barnesandnoble.com/p/wha...SABEgI9_fD_BwE
You are the ones who keep talking about her.
![]()
Me having no evidence would not preclude the occurrence. This is why you constantly trying to pretend you're a lawyer in a courtroom is a bit sad.
I don't mind rubbing the salt in your wound. Was that supposed to be a good point?
you get so defensive when you're caught talking out of your assistance.
She lives rent free in your head.
Definitely a coping mechanism.
#StillWithHer
I abhor what I read about their rendition program, etc, but I would need to take a leap of faith to ascertain that: 1) it happened as described, 2) they did not have the authority to do so (thus making them a criminal organization).
Now, we can certainly agree that if they carried out these operations as described, the whole thing is abhorrent, *even* if they had authorization to do so (although, it's debatable whether the responsibility lies on the whole agency or the person making those authorizations).
So it has nothing to do with me thinking they're a wonderful organization or a terrible organization, it's just that I prefer not to draw conclusions from allegations. I would expect the same courtesy applied to me (or anybody else for that matter).
Definitely your coping mechanism.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)