U.S. Code of Federal Regulations defines terrorism as "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives"
Yeah US usually uses their caveats of “we are defending our interests or we are at war” to hide their direct terrorism
And countries have been doing that forever tbqh
But we are talking about sponsoring terrorism. Which US cannot really hide. You cannot realoy hide the fact you funded and armed jihadists that caused all kinds of mayhem in countries
what's the common definition?
Basically hurting or intimidating common ppl for purpose of political, social or religious objctive. Tbqh
USA. And second place isn't even close.
it was their money lmao! iran first off. second, freeze all their assets regardless and tell them to off.
yall are some treasonous bas s huh? rooting/standing up for iran is ridiculous.
nobody is rooting for Iran... we are just laughing at your stupidity and ignorance
pretty sure yall are. btw, how's ol' hole brazil doing these days?
*Risitas
So once you figure out Iran is the number one sponsor of terror it's pretty easy to see why we pulled out. People that are upset about it are either:
A) In denial that Obama would us over like that.
B) DRUMPF!
Stop being a pussy and give a concrete answer
Literally just said Obama's plan was ty lmao. I mean c'mon guys seriously there must be an intellectual conservative plan. Maybe a George Will article or something
Tell me more about dat Iran deal that you know so much
Meghan McCain to GOP "You guys have no other plan"
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/09/who...-another-plan/
What plan? We withdrew from the Iran deal.
End of story.
Who literally just said that? You or aztec?
She your hero?
that's been the prevailing question
And the prevailing undercurrent is your butthurt about Obama's deal getting nixed.
oh cool. now we live happily ever after I guess
You agree with the deal getting nixed?
Yes or no.
Days after violating Iran nuclear agreement, Trump administration is demanding Iran comply
senior administration officials said monitoring should continue regardless.
Making his withdrawal announcement on Tuesday, Trump pilloried the accord for lacking mechanisms to "prevent, detect, and punish cheating" or provide immediate access to su ious military sites.
the White House is demanding those inspections, however imperfect, continue under the aegis of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
why in the world would North Korea even think of complying with any kind of agreement it might make with Trump?
Not when this is how he approaches "deals."
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/5/10/1763433/-Days-after-violating-Iran-nuclear-agreement-Trump-administration-is-demanding-Iran-comply
Trash just wanted to destroy Obama's major foreign policy success, "it's personal (not business)"
nah. they were complying
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
