Reply With Quote
But..but what about my oh my tweet tho?yeah... i would deflect from the manafort ruling too
yeah... i would deflect from the manafort ruling too
But..but what about my oh my tweet tho?yeah... i would deflect from the manafort ruling too
But..but what about my oh my tweet tho?
Julie Annie threatening Mueller
Rudy Giuliani warns Mueller to listen to Trump — and threatens him with ‘additional step’
the White House is starting a campaign against special counsel Robert Mueller.
If the prosecutor doesn’t heed their threats and cave into their demands,
they might take “additional steps,”
“We are going to try as best we can to put the message out there that it has been a year, there has been no evidence presented of collusion or obstruction, and
it is about time for them to end the investigation,” Giuliani said.
“We don’t want to signal our action if this doesn’t work — we are going to hope they listen to us — but
obviously we have a Plan B and C.”
Giuliani also said that there is no reason for Mueller to interview Trump.
If Mueller wants to talk to the president, the former New York mayor said that he would need to turn over the 1.2 million pages of do ents cataloging White House interviews and court do ents.
He also intends to demand that the investigation end shortly.
the Watergate investigation took more than two years and
the GOP’s Benghazi investigation continued for four years after the 2012 attacks.
In the investigation into former President Bill Clinton,
special counsel Ken Starr was appointed Aug. 1994. Impeachment for Clinton was initiated in Dec. 1998.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/rud...e+Raw+Story%29
I addressed Manafort almost immediately.
lol deflecting
you addressed it with risitas
what are your thoughts on the judge denying manafort's motion to dismiss, and ruling that the charges are within the scope of mueller's investigation?
I'm not concerned with Manafort since it had nothing to do with the Trump campaign.
brah you cant be celebrating one judge's comments on manafort and then a few days later pretend you dont care about manafort
brah you cant be celebrating one judge's comments on manafort and then a few days later pretend you dont care about manafort
Nothing on Manafort case? Love the deflecting
What's the conspiracy theory now, TSA?
I'm not really concerned with Manafort's past.brah you cant be celebrating one judge's comments on manafort and then a few days later pretend you dont care about manafort
"By that weekend, as a result of consultations within these government agencies, Strzok was headed to London."
Interesting.
the you shouldn't have creamed your pants over judge ellis' comments last week about his case
its just sour grapes tbh... things didnt go your way today, so you act like you dont care
I didn't cream my pants. Just pointed to the fact that Mueller got rejected twice by two different judges. This sent you off into a tangent for some reason. You can play revisionist history and project all you like.the you shouldn't have creamed your pants over judge ellis' comments last week about his case
its just sour grapes tbh... things didnt go your way today, so you act like you dont care
You know who got rejected by a judge today? Manafort.
What got rejected?
All the judge said was that Mueller was trying to get Trump. Did the judge dismiss the case? Or was he just being unprofessional by giving his opinion without all the facts?
I know this a big win for you - I will let you and Reck celebrate.
no. you showed one judge deny a continuance, and one judge saying things but not making any rulings or orders
It's not a win for me. It is a win for the rule of law.
brah you cant be celebrating one judge's comments on manafort and then a few days later pretend you dont care about manafort
2/90 = 14%
Damn...spurraider crossing Chris over en route to an easy layup tbh
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions